Back to Search Start Over

Intrathecal Morphine for Postpartum Tubal Ligation Postoperative Analgesia

Authors :
Celina M. Riben
Ray W. Yip
David Campbell
Michael E. Rooney
Lesley-Ann L. Crone
Source :
Anesthesia & Analgesia. 93:1006-1011
Publication Year :
2001
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2001.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) provides effective postoperative cesarean delivery analgesia but has not been reported for postoperative postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL) analgesia. We designed this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study to determine the efficacy of 100 microg ITM for postoperative PPTL analgesia. Sixty-six women received spinal anesthesia with 60 mg (1.2 mL) of 5% hyperbaric lidocaine, 10 microg (0.2 mL) of fentanyl, and either 0.2 mL of 0.9% saline (normal saline; NS) or 100 microg (0.2 mL) of morphine (morphine sulfate, MS). Postoperative analgesia was limited to patient-controlled IV analgesia morphine. Six women (three NS and three MS) were excluded because of major protocol violations. Twenty-four-hour patient-controlled IV analgesia morphine use was (mean +/- SD) 39.6 +/- 19.6 mg in the NS group and 1.1 +/- 2.5 mg in the MS group (P < 0.0000001). Visual analog scale scores for crampy and incisional pain (rest and movement) were significantly higher in the NS group compared with the MS group at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h (P < 0.001). The adverse effect profile was similar between groups. Visual analog scale satisfaction scores (mean +/- SD) were 96.6 +/- 16.0 in the MS group and 84.2 +/- 23.6 in NS group (P < 0.05). The results of this study indicate that women experience significant postoperative pain after PPTL surgery, and this pain is effectively obviated by 100 microg ITM. IMPLICATIONS: This investigation documents the extent of the significant postoperative pain experienced by women after routine postpartum tubal ligation surgery and demonstrates the efficacy of a small dose (100 microg) of intrathecal morphine to obviate this pain with minimal adverse effects.

Details

ISSN :
00032999
Volume :
93
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........e8550f56a64d7818cc964cb18e122bfe
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200110000-00042