Back to Search Start Over

Wall stress analyses in patients with ≥5 cm versus <5 cm ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm

Authors :
Andrew D. Wisneski
Justin Inman
Zhongjie Wang
Yue Xuan
Matthew Y. Lum
Nick Flores
David Saloner
Elaine E. Tseng
Liang Ge
Michael D. Hope
Julius M. Guccione
Source :
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 162:1452-1459
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Objective Current guidelines for elective surgery of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (aTAAs) use aneurysm size as primary determinant for risk stratification of adverse events. Biomechanically, dissection may occur when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Determining patient-specific aTAA wall stresses by finite element analysis can potentially predict patient-specific risk of dissection. This study compared peak wall stresses in patients with ≥5.0 cm versus Methods Patients with aTAA ≥5.0 cm (n = 47) and Results Peak circumferential stresses at systolic pressure were 530 &#177; 83 kPa for aTAA ≥5.0 cm versus 486 &#177; 87 kPa for aTAA Conclusions Peak patient-specific aTAA wall stresses overall were larger for ≥5.0 cm than aTAA

Details

ISSN :
00225223
Volume :
162
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........ef2646c43b5e952b008f5e07d68e8d2a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.046