Back to Search
Start Over
Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Self-Reported Treatment of Exercise-Associated Muscle Cramping Differ Between 21.1- and 56-Km Running Race Entrants—SAFER XXII
- Source :
- Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 32:415-421
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2021.
-
Abstract
- OBJECTIVE To determine whether the lifetime prevalence and clinical characteristics of exercise-associated muscle cramping (EAMC) differ between runners entering a 21.1- versus 56-km road race. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING The 2012 to 2015 Two Oceans Marathon races (21.1 and 56 km), South Africa. PARTICIPANTS Participants were consenting race entrants (21.1 km = 44 458; 56 km = 26 962) who completed an online prerace medical screening questionnaire. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE A history of EAMC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome variables were lifetime prevalence (%) and clinical characteristics (muscle groups affected, timing of occurrence, severity, frequency of serious EAMC, and self-reported treatment) of a history of EAMC. Differences between 56- and 21.1-km race entrants were explored (relative risk [RR]). RESULTS The lifetime prevalence of EAMC was 12.8%, which was higher in 56- (20.0%; 95% CI 19.5-20.6) versus 21.1-km race entrants (8.5%; 8.2-8.8) (P = 0.0001). In all entrants, the fourth quarter was the most common onset (46.4%), calf muscles were the most commonly affected (53.1%), and most EAMCs were of mild-to-moderate severity (95%). In 56- versus 21.1-km entrants, hamstring (RR = 1.7; 1.5-1.9) and quadriceps muscle groups (RR = 1.5; 1.3-1.7) were more frequently affected (P = 0.0001), the onset of EAMC during racing was less common in the first quarter (RR = 0.3; 0.2-0.4) (P = 0.0001), and serious EAMC was more frequent (RR = 1.6; 1.4-1.9) (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In 56- versus 21.1-km runners, a history of EAMC is 2 times more frequent and muscle groups affected, onset in a race, and severity of EAMC differed. The lifetime prevalence was lower than previously reported in other events. Risk factors associated with EAMC may differ between entrants for different race distances.
Details
- ISSN :
- 1050642X
- Volume :
- 32
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........f24560a715b04e305903924aa1386fce
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0000000000000992