Back to Search Start Over

Destructive and non-destructive density determination: method comparison and evaluation from the Laguna Potrok Aike sedimentary record

Authors :
Guillaume St-Onge
A.C. Gebhardt
Rajarshi Roychowdhury
P. Kliem
Agathe Lisé-Pronovost
Jacques Labrie
Pierre Francus
David Fortin
Annette Hahn
Source :
Quaternary Science Reviews. 71:147-153
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2013.

Abstract

Density measurements play a central role in the characterization of sediment profiles. When working with long records (>100 m), such as those routinely obtained within the frame of the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program, several methods can be used, all of them varying in resolution, time-cost efficiency and source of errors within the measurements. This paper compares two relatively new non-destructive densitometric methods, CT-Scanning and the coherent/incoherent ratio from an Itrax XRF core Scanner, to data acquired from a Multi-sensor core logger Gamma Ray Attenuation Porosity Evaluator (MSCL Grape) and discrete measurements of dry bulk density, wet bulk density and water content. Quality assessment of density measurements is performed at low and high resolution along the Laguna Potrok Aike (LPA) composite sequence. Giving its resolution (0.4 mm in our study), its high signal to noise ratio, we conclude that CT-Scan provides a precise, fast and cost-efficient way to determine density variation of long sedimentary record. Although more noisy that the CT-Scan measurements, coherent/incoherent ratio from the XRF core scanner also provides a high-resolution, reliable continuous measure of density variability of the sediment profile. The MSCL Grape density measurements provide actual density data and have the significant advantage to be completely non-destructive since the acquisition is performed on full cores prior to opening. However, the quality MSCL Grape density measurements can potentially be reduced by the presence of voids within the sediment core tubes and the dry and bulk density measurements suffers from sampling challenges and are time-consuming.

Details

ISSN :
02773791
Volume :
71
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Quaternary Science Reviews
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........fe76b4724ea89090cc300bb24d3d33b9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.08.024