Back to Search Start Over

The Effects of the Thomas Appointment to the Supreme Court

Authors :
Karen O'Connor
Source :
PS: Political Science & Politics. 25:492-495
Publication Year :
1992
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1992.

Abstract

In announcing his nomination of Clarence Thomas to the United States Supreme Court on July 2, 1991, George Bush described him as “a fiercely independent thinker with an excellent legal mind,” and proclaimed his belief that Thomas would “be a great Justice.” While many legal and political commentators had predicted that Clarence Thomas stood an excellent chance of being Bush's nominee to replace the retiring Thurgood Marshall, few were quick to echo Bush's assessment that Thomas was:… the best qualified at this time …. Clarence Thomas … fits my description of the best man at the right time. … I kept my word to the American people and to the Senate by picking the best man for the job on the merits. (New York Times, 2 July 1991)Even as Bush offered Thomas's name in nomination, the skeptics were muttering about the hyperbole that surrounded the announcement. Thomas's total lack of courtroom experience and his generally undistinguished record as a jurist led many to question his qualifications to serve on the High Court. Concern with his general absence of legal credentials prompted the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary to rate Thomas merely as “Qualified”—making him the only nominee with such a low rating to serve on the Supreme Court.The authority and prestige of the United States Supreme Court have always rested on its support from the other branches of government and, perhaps even more importantly, on the support of the American public.

Details

ISSN :
15375935 and 10490965
Volume :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PS: Political Science & Politics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....00dc7044c932495cb5332241c94df851
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2307/419440