Sorry, I don't understand your search. ×
Back to Search Start Over

Radiomic Machine Learning Classifiers in Spine Bone Tumors: A Multi-Software, Multi-Scanner Study

Authors :
Antonina Parafioriti
Alessandro Luzzati
Luca Maria Sconfienza
Julietta Badalyan
Salvatore Gitto
Renato Cuocolo
Domenico Albano
Ilaria Merli
Vito Chianca
Carmelo Messina
Maria Cristina Cortese
Fabio Galbusera
Arturo Brunetti
Chianca, Vito
Cuocolo, Renato
Gitto, Salvatore
Albano, Domenico
Merli, Ilaria
Badalyan, Julietta
Cortese, Maria Cristina
Messina, Carmelo
Luzzati, Alessandro
Parafioriti, Antonina
Galbusera, Fabio
Brunetti, Arturo
Sconfienza, Luca Maria
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Zenodo, 2021.

Abstract

Purpose:Spinal lesion differential diagnosis remains challenging even in MRI. Radiomics and machine learning (ML) have proven useful even in absence of a standardized data mining pipeline. We aimed to assess ML diagnostic performance in spinal lesion differential diagnosis, employing radiomic data extracted by different software. Methods:Patients undergoing MRI for a vertebral lesion were retrospectively analyzed (n = 146, 67 males, 79 females; mean age 63 ± 16 years, range 8-89 years) and constituted the train (n = 100) and internal test cohorts (n = 46). Part of the latter had additional prior exams which constituted a multi-scanner, external test cohort (n = 35). Lesions were labeled as benign or malignant (2-label classification), and benign, primary malignant or metastases (3-label classification) for classification analyses. Features extracted via 3D Slicer heterogeneityCAD module (hCAD) and PyRadiomics were independently used to compare different combinations of feature selection methods and ML classifiers (n = 19). Results:In total, 90 and 1548 features were extracted by hCAD and PyRadiomics, respectively. The best feature selection method-ML algorithm combination was selected by 10 iterations of 10-fold cross-validation in the training data. For the 2-label classification ML obtained 94% accuracy in the internal test cohort, using hCAD data, and 86% in the external one. For the 3-label classification, PyRadiomics data allowed for 80% and 69% accuracy in the internal and external test sets, respectively. Conclusions:MRI radiomics combined with ML may be useful in spinal lesion assessment. More robust pre-processing led to better consistency despite scanner and protocol heterogeneity.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0264e464632849bfe9cde5017001e824