Microsurgical versus endoscopic trans-sphenoidal approaches for clivus chordoma: a pooled and meta-analysis

Chordoma is a rare slow-growing neoplastic bone lesion. However, they show an invasive local growth and high recurrence rate, leading to an overall survival rate of 65% at 5 years and 35% at 10 years. We conducted a pooled and meta-analysis comparing recurrence rate, post-operative-complications, and survival in patients undergoing either microsurgical (MA) or endoscopic approaches (EA). Search of literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify surgical series of clivus chordomas published between January 1990 and March 2018 on Pubmed, Scopus, and Cochrane. Two different statistical analyses have been performed: a pooled analysis and a single-arm meta-analysis of overall recurrence rate and subgroup meta-analysis of complications in the subgroups open surgery and endoscopic surgery. After full-text screening, a total of 58 articles were included in the pooled analysis and 27 studies were included for the study-level meta-analysis. Pooled analysis—the extent of resection was the only association that remained significant (subtotal: HR = 2.18, p = 0.004; partial: HR = 4.40, p < 0.001). Recurrence was more prevalent among the surgical patients (45.5%) compared to endoscopic ones (23.7%). Meta-analysis—results of the cumulative meta-analysis showed an overall rate of recurrence of 25.6%. MA recurrence rate was 31.8% (99% CI 14-52.8), EA recurrence rate was 19.4% (5.4-39.2). CSF leak rate for the endoscopic group was 10.3% (99%CI 5-17.3) and 9.5% (99%CI 1.2-24.6) for the open surgery group. The partial removal versus total removal has an influence on recurrence rate (p < 0.001). MA recurrence rate was 31.8%; EA recurrence rate was 19.4%. The extent of resection is confirmed as a statistically significant factor affecting the risk for recurrence both with the pooled analysis and with the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated that older patients tend to recur more than young patients, especially in surgical group.