Back to Search Start Over

Consensus Report by the Italian Academy of Osseointegration on the Use of Graft Materials in Postextraction Sites

Authors :
Caiazzo, Alfonso
Canullo, Luigi
Pesce, Paolo
Stefano, Ameri
Marco, Antonelli
Achille, Bassetti
Hussam, Batal
Billi, Mauro
Valentina, Borgia
Andrea Enrico Borgonovo
Bressan, Eriberto
Francesco, Briguglio
Federico, Brugnami
Andrea, Camurati
Massimiliano, Camusso
Matteo, Capelli
Daniele, Cardaropoli
Guerino, Caso
Antonio, Cipressa
Salvatore, D’Amato
Alessandro Di Marco
Danilo Alessio Di Stefano
Matteo, Doto
Vittorio Siro Leone Farina
Davide, Farronato
Fontana, Filippo
Massimo, Frosecchi
Francesco, Galletti
Guido, Galletti
Fabio, Galli
Tommaso, Ghedini
Francesco, Giordano
Mario, Gisotti
Francesco, Giuzio
Donato, Grampone
Felice Roberto Grassi
Guazzo, Riccardo
DI GUIDA, Antonio
Iorio, Marco
Roberto, Kaitsas
Vincenzo La Scala
Luigi, Laino
Andrea, Lazza
Lops, Diego
Roberto, Luongo
Stefano, Magrin
Carlo, Mangano
Giuseppe, Marano
Marra, Roberto
Aniello, Martiniello
Michele, Marzolo
Christian, Monti
Jason Motta Jones
Mottola Maria Pia
Priamo, Mura
Muzzi, Leonardo
Alberto, Padovan
Piermario, Palattella
Andrea, Parpaiola
Massimo, Pedrinazzi
David, Penarrocha
Alberto, Pispero
Roberto, Pistilli
Mia, Rakic
Stefano, Romeggio
Eugenio, Romeo
Alessandro Luigi Rossi
Roberto, Sacco
Antonio, Salierno
Sergio, Salina
Giacomo, Santoro
Stefano, Sartori
Sbricoli, Luca
Riccardo, Scaini
Massimo, Scanferla
Todd, Schoenbaum
Luca, Signorini
Fabio, Smorto
Walter, Stablum
Luigi, Tagliatesta
Tiziano, Testori
Filippo, Tomarelli
Grazia, Tommasato
Stefano, Trasarti
Enzo, Vaia
Mario, Villaricca
Raffaele, Vinci
Sergio, Zulian
Source :
The International journal of oralmaxillofacial implants. 37(1)
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

After tooth extraction, a modeling and remodeling phase of bone and soft tissues occurs. It has been fully demonstrated that bone resorption as high as 50% can take place regarding ridge width and a variable amount concerning ridge height, making it difficult to perform implant surgery.Active members of the Italian Academy of Osseointegration (IAO) participated in this Consensus Conference, and three systematic reviews were conducted before the meeting to provide guidelines on alveolar ridge preservation procedures. The systematic reviews covered the following topics: (1) What material best preserves the dimensions of the ridge horizontally and vertically?; (2) what material favors the formation of the highest quantity of new bone?; (3) which technique would best seal the socket?; and (4) what effect does alveolar ridge preservation have on soft tissues?The main conclusions reached by the assembly were that alveolar ridge preservation is advisable after dental extraction, particularly in esthetic areas, in proximity of anatomical structures (ie, maxillary sinus, inferior alveolar nerve, and mental foramen), whenever the treatment plan requires delayed placement, and whenever patients ask to postpone implant insertion for various reasons. Socket debridement is advised before the use of a "regenerative material," and xenograft is considered the gold standard material to maintain ridge dimensions. Another indication is antibiotic therapy, which is recommended in the case of alveolar ridge preservation (amoxicillin 2 g 1 hour before the intervention and 1 g every 12 hours for 6 days). A membrane or autologous soft tissue should be used to seal the socket and protect the regenerative material, and the indicated reentry time (implant insertion) is 4 to 6 months.This Consensus Conference agreed that the adoption of alveolar ridge preservation can effectively prevent physiologic bone loss, especially in esthetic areas. It is recommended to cover the xenograft material with a membrane or autologous soft tissue, and antibiotic therapy is advisable.

Details

ISSN :
19424434
Volume :
37
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The International journal of oralmaxillofacial implants
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....04f2cf94c7b23e9c58fa820aa43e91b8