Influence of the pre- or postlingual status of cochlear implant recipients on behavioural T/C-levels

Introduction Previous auditory experience modifies the sensitivity of the auditory cortex to the afferent activity of the auditory pathways and may influence the threshold (T) and comfort (C) levels in patients receiving a cochlear implant (CI). Literature data on this particular topic is very scarce. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the differences in T/C-levels between pre- and postlingually implanted cochlear implant patients. Methods Retrospective case review in a quaternary otologic referral centre was performed. Data on the T/C-levels have been collected in 90 consecutive CI patients divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 16 prelingually deaf children implanted between 8 months and 10 years of age. Group 2 comprised 74 postlingually deaf adults (average age of 62 years). All patients were users of the Nucleus 24RECA (Freedom, Contour Advance-of-Stylet electrode) cochlear implant. All measurements were performed at the fifth implant programming session at 4–6 months after surgery, when stable T/C thresholds have already been obtained. Results The behavioural C-levels present important and statistically significant differences between the pre- and postlingually implanted patients for all electrode contacts that could reach 30 CL. For the T-levels the observed differences were smaller and statistically insignificant for most electrode contacts. Conclusions The previous auditory experience (pre- or postlingual deafness) seems to be an independent parameter influencing the T/C-levels in patients receiving a CI. Together with the electrode contact impedance and the contact position in the electrode array it can explain up to 37% of the variability in the definition of the C-levels. The fact that the stabilised C-levels measured 4–6 months postoperatively can be up to 30 CL higher in the prelingually deaf patients than in the postlingual ones results also in a much higher dynamic range observed in prelingual subjects. Therefore implant programming of the prelingual patients should be very cautious in order to avoid the risk of overstimulation.