Back to Search
Start Over
Readability of Human Subjects Training Materials for Research
- Source :
- Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 13:95-100
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- SAGE Publications, 2017.
-
Abstract
- Institutions are required to ensure that persons involved in human subjects research receive appropriate human subjects protections training and education. Several organizations use the Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) program to fulfill training requirements. Most researchers find the CITI program too complex for community members who collaborate with researchers. This study aimed to determine the readability of CITI modules most frequently used in community-based participatory research (CBPR). The mean readability level of the CITI modules is 14.8 grade; CBPR readability levels ranged from 11.6 to 12.0 grade (sixth- to eighth-grade reading level is recommended). With a baseline objective measure, modifications can be made to improve the plain language quality and understandability of human subjects training modules for community members.
- Subjects :
- Community-Based Participatory Research
Social Psychology
Research Subjects
Teaching Materials
media_common.quotation_subject
Participatory action research
Community-based participatory research
Education, Nonprofessional
Training (civil)
Reading level
Article
Ethics, Research
Education
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Residence Characteristics
Humans
Quality (business)
030212 general & internal medicine
Plain language
Baseline (configuration management)
media_common
Medical education
030505 public health
Communication
Readability
Health Literacy
Human Experimentation
Reading
Comprehension
0305 other medical science
Psychology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15562654 and 15562646
- Volume :
- 13
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....07c2a459d6648fd3cdb0d5dc47e608fe
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617742238