Cite
Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 2 : current knowledge of carcinogenesis shows that categorization as a carcinogen or non-carcinogen is not scientifically credible
MLA
Timothy P. Pastoor, et al. Chemical Carcinogenicity Revisited 2 : Current Knowledge of Carcinogenesis Shows That Categorization as a Carcinogen or Non-Carcinogen Is Not Scientifically Credible. Jan. 2019. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....089306f40cf3e00002ab6195cb05abb8&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Timothy P. Pastoor, Alan R. Boobis, Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp, John E. Doe, Angelo Moretto, Jennifer Seed, Vicki L. Dellarco, Rita Schoeny, & Douglas C. Wolf. (2019). Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 2 : current knowledge of carcinogenesis shows that categorization as a carcinogen or non-carcinogen is not scientifically credible.
Chicago
Timothy P. Pastoor, Alan R. Boobis, Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp, John E. Doe, Angelo Moretto, Jennifer Seed, Vicki L. Dellarco, Rita Schoeny, and Douglas C. Wolf. 2019. “Chemical Carcinogenicity Revisited 2 : Current Knowledge of Carcinogenesis Shows That Categorization as a Carcinogen or Non-Carcinogen Is Not Scientifically Credible,” January. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....089306f40cf3e00002ab6195cb05abb8&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.