Back to Search Start Over

A risk score to predict postdischarge bleeding among acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: BRIC-ACS study

Authors :
Ming Yang
Chuanyu Gao
Lefeng Wang
Yi-Da Tang
Jingping Wang
Zhanquan Li
Zhimin Du
Heping Liu
Qin Qin
Xiaoshu Cheng
Dingcheng Xiang
Wenqi Zhang
Shanglang Cai
Xuchen Zhou
Xi Su
Yang Zheng
Hui Chen
Shuyang Zhang
Tong Yin
Juying Qian
Shaoping Nie
Xianxian Zhao
Yundai Chen
Guosheng Fu
Hui Li
Hongbing Yan
Baiming Qu
Zhi-Ming Yang
Shaozhi Xi
Lin Wang
Jiyan Chen
Ying Guo
Source :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac AngiographyInterventions. 93(7)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prevents ischemic events while increasing bleeding risk. Real-world-based metrics to accurately predict postdischarge bleeding (PDB) occurrence and its potential impact on postdischarge major cardiovascular event (MACE) remain undefined. This study sought to evaluate the impact of PDB on MACE occurrence, and to develop a score to predict PDB risk among Chinese acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients after PCI. Methods and results From May 2014 to January 2016, 2496 ACS patients who underwent PCI were recruited consecutively from 29 nationally representative Chinese tertiary hospitals. Among 2,381 patients (95.4%, 2,381/2,496) who completed 1-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence of PDB (bleeding academic research consortium type [BARC] ≥2) and postdischarge MACE (a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization) was 4.9% (n = 117) and 3.3% (n = 79), respectively. The association between PDB and MACE during 1-year follow-up, as well as the impact of DAPT with ticagrelor or clopidogrel on PDB were evaluated. PDB was associated with higher risk of postdischarge MACE (7.7 vs. 3.1%; adjusted hazard ratio: 2.59 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-5.74]; p = .02). For ticagrelor versus clopidogrel, PDB risk was higher (8.0 vs. 4.4%; 2.05 [1.17-3.60]; p = .01), while MACE risk was similar (2.0 vs. 3.4%; 0.70 [0.25-1.93]; p = .49). Based on identified PDB predictors, the constructed bleeding risk in real world Chinese acute coronary syndrome patients (BRIC-ACS) score for PDB was established. C-statistic for the score for PDB was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.62-0.73) in the overall cohort, and >0.70 in subgroups with non-ST- and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, diabetes and receiving more than two drug eluting stents. Conclusions In Chinese ACS patients, PDB with BARC ≥2 was associated with higher risk for MACE after PCI. The constructed BRIC-ACS risk score provides a useful tool for PDB discrimination, particularly among high ischemic and bleeding risk patients.

Details

ISSN :
1522726X
Volume :
93
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac AngiographyInterventions
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....08ba9467cb9d1b56a197f9d66e8abdcd