Back to Search Start Over

Influence of Prior Advice and Beliefs of Mothers on Infant Sleep Position

Authors :
Denis Rybin
Isabelle Von Kohorn
George Lister
Timothy Heeren
Eve R. Colson
Michael J. Corwin
Source :
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 164
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
American Medical Association (AMA), 2010.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the relationship between the advice mothers receive about infant sleep position and the actual position they place their infants in to sleep and to understand modifiers of that relationship, especially beliefs about infant comfort and safety. Design: Cross-sectional, face-to-face interviews. Setting: Women, Infants, and Children centers in the United States from 2006 to 2008. Participants: A t otal o f 2 299 p redominantly African American mothers of infants younger than 8 months. Main Exposure: Advice received and beliefs about infant sleep position. Outcome Measure: Usually supine infant sleep position. Results: Advice for exclusively supine infant sleep position from family (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.17-2.17), doctors (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.77-2.93), nurses (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.151.84), or the media (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.22-1.95) was associated with usually placing an infant supine to sleep. Additional sources of advice for exclusively supine position significantly increase the odds that an infant will be placed supine. Mothers who believe an infant is comfortable supine are more likely to place their infants on their backs to sleep (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 2.51-6.53). Mothers who believe an infant will choke on its back are less likely to place their infants supine (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.54). Conclusion: Among predominantly African American mothers, increasing advice for exclusively supine sleep and addressing concerns about infant comfort and choking remain critical to getting more infants on their back to sleep.

Details

ISSN :
10724710
Volume :
164
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0932a7d1ec8cc66bdfa05f6d2e5e3292
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.26