Back to Search
Start Over
A Study of Query Reformulation for Patent Prior Art Search with Partial Patent Applications
- Source :
- 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Jun 2015, San Diego, United States. pp.23-32, ⟨10.1145/2746090.2746092⟩, ICAIL
- Publication Year :
- 2015
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2015.
-
Abstract
- International audience; Patents are used by legal entities to legally protect their inventions and represent a multi-billion dollar industry of licensing and litigation. In 2014, 326,033 patent applications were approved in the US alone -- a number that has doubled in the past 15 years and which makes prior art search a daunting, but necessary task in the patent application process. In this work, we seek to investigate the efficacy of prior art search strategies from the perspective of the inventor who wishes to assess the patentability of their ideas prior to writing a full application. While much of the literature inspired by the evaluation framework of the CLEF-IP competition has aimed to assist patent examiners in assessing prior art for complete patent applications, less of this work has focused on patent search with queries representing partial applications. In the (partial) patent search setting, a query is often much longer than in other standard IR tasks, e.g., the description section may contain hundreds or even thousands of words. While the length of such queries may suggest query reduction strategies to remove irrelevant terms, intentional obfuscation and general language used in patents suggests that it may help to expand queries with additionally relevant terms. To assess the trade-offs among all of these pre-application prior art search strategies, we comparatively evaluate a variety of partial application search and query reformulation methods. Among numerous findings, querying with a full description, perhaps in conjunction with generic (non-patent specific) query reduction methods, is recommended for best performance. However, we also find that querying with an abstract represents the best trade-off in terms of writing effort vs. retrieval efficacy (i.e., querying with the description sections only lead to marginal improvements) and that for such relatively short queries, generic query expansion methods help.
- Subjects :
- Information retrieval
Computer science
Process (engineering)
Partial application
Patent Search
ComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTING
Query Reformulation
Data science
Patent application
ACM: H.: Information Systems/H.3: INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL/H.3.3: Information Search and Retrieval
Task (computing)
Query expansion
Web query classification
Obfuscation
Patentability
[INFO]Computer Science [cs]
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Jun 2015, San Diego, United States. pp.23-32, ⟨10.1145/2746090.2746092⟩, ICAIL
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0a4be4253964a69d4db9f40e92749226
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746092⟩