Back to Search
Start Over
Reliability and accuracy of time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in hypervascular spinal metastases prior embolization
- Source :
- European Radiology, European Radiology, Springer Verlag, 2021, ⟨10.1007/s00330-020-07654-3⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Preoperative embolization of hypervascular spinal metastases (HSM) is efficient to reduce perioperative bleeding. However, intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA) must confirm the hypervascular nature and rule out spinal cord arterial feeders. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (TR-CE-MRA) in assessing HSM prior to embolization. All consecutive patients referred for preoperative embolization of an HSM were prospectively included. TR-CE-MRA sequences and selective IA-DSA were performed prior to embolization. Two readers independently reviewed imaging data to grade tumor vascularity (using a 3-grade and a dichotomized “yes vs no” scale) and identify the arterial supply of the spinal cord. Interobserver and intermodality agreements were estimated using kappa statistics. Thirty patients included between 2016 and 2019 were assessed for 55 levels. Interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.52; 95% CI [0.09–0.81]) for TR-CE-MRA. Intermodality agreement between TR-CE-MRA and IA-DSA was good (κ = 0.74; 95% CI [0.37–1.00]). TR-CE-MRA had a sensitivity of 97.9%, a specificity of 71.4%, a positive predictive value of 95.9%, a negative predictive value of 83.3%, and an overall accuracy of 94.6%, for differentiating hypervascular from non-hypervascular SM. The arterial supply of the spine was assessable in 2/30 (6.7%) cases with no interobserver agreement (κ < 0). TR-CE-MRA can reliably differentiate hypervascular from non-hypervascular SM and thereby avoid futile IA-DSAs. However, TR-CE-MRA was not able to evaluate the vascular supply of the spinal cord at the target levels, thus limiting its scope as a pretherapeutic assessment tool. • TR-CE-MRA aids in distinguishing hypervascular from non-hypervascular spinal metastases. • TR-CE-MRA could avoid one-quarter of patients referred for HSM embolization to undergo futile conventional angiography. • TR-CE-MRA’s spatial resolution is insufficient to replace IA-DSA in the pretherapeutic assessment of the spinal cord vascular anatomy.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
medicine.medical_treatment
Contrast Media
Sensitivity and Specificity
Magnetic resonance angiography
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
[INFO.INFO-IM]Computer Science [cs]/Medical Imaging
Humans
Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Embolization
Neuroradiology
Spinal Neoplasms
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Ultrasound
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
Reproducibility of Results
Interventional radiology
General Medicine
Digital subtraction angiography
Perioperative
Spinal cord
Spine
medicine.anatomical_structure
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Radiology
business
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14321084 and 09387994
- Volume :
- 31
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Radiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0acbda41735b4cd3bdebea792250a7e8
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07654-3