Back to Search Start Over

A comparison of the diagnostic value of 2D strain stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, and Duke treadmill score in patients suspected of coronary artery disease

Authors :
Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen
June Anita Ejlersen
Ole May
Jesper C A Mortensen
Source :
Ejlersen, J A, Poulsen, S H, Mortensen, J & May, O 2016, ' A comparison of the diagnostic value of 2D strain stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, and Duke treadmill score in patients suspected of coronary artery disease ', Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1523-1531 . https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.13297
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Wiley, 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preinvasive risk stratification is recommended in patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD). Stress echocardiography (SE), myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), and exercise test are the dominant methods of choice. Vasodilator SE is fast and induces only minor increase in heart rate. The diagnostic value of the absolute stress-rest difference in endocardial global longitudinal strain (ΔeGLS) and wall motion (ΔWMI) from adenosine SE was compared to summed stress score (SSS) from MPS and Duke treadmill score (DTS) from exercise test, using quantitative invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference.METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 128 patients (69% male, 62.7 (8.8) years) underwent adenosine SE, MPS, exercise test, and ICA. Forty-five patients (35%) had CAD. All stress outcomes differed significantly (PCONCLUSION: Alterations in eGLS and wall motion during adenosine SE were closely associated with the presence of CAD and the combined sensitivity similar to that of MPS. If nuclear medical facilities are unavailable or radiation issues important, vasodilator ΔeGLS could be an acceptable alternative for patients unable to exercise.

Details

ISSN :
07422822
Volume :
33
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Echocardiography
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0b01b1ff2eac309808c4b5823698eeaf
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.13297