Back to Search Start Over

Fully-staggered-array bulk Re-Ba-Cu-O short-period undulator: large-scale 3D electromagnetic modelling and design optimization using A-V and H-formulation methods

Authors :
Thomas Schmidt
Mark D. Ainslie
Ryota Kinjo
Kai Zhang
Marco Calvi
Zhang, K [0000-0002-3830-9682]
Ainslie, M [0000-0003-0466-3680]
Calvi, M [0000-0002-2502-942X]
Kinjo, R [0000-0002-0873-7117]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Zhang, Kai [0000-0002-3830-9682]
Ainslie, Mark [0000-0003-0466-3680]
Calvi, Marco [0000-0002-2502-942X]
Kinjo, Ryota [0000-0002-0873-7117]
Source :
Superconductor Science and Technology. 34:094002
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
IOP Publishing, 2021.

Abstract

The development of a new hard x-ray beamline I-TOMCAT equipped with a 1-meter-long short-period bulk high-temperature superconductor undulator (BHTSU) has been scheduled for the upgrade of the Swiss Light Source (SLS 2.0) at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). The very hard x-ray source generated by the BHTSU will increase the brilliance at the beamline by over one order of magnitude in comparison to other state-of-the-art undulator technologies and allow experiments to be carried out with photon energies in excess of 60 keV. One of the key challenges for designing a 1-meter-long (100 periods) BHTSU is the large-scale simulation of the magnetization currents inside 200 staggered-array bulk superconductors. A feasible approach to simplify the electromagnetic model is to retain five periods from both ends of the 1-meter-long BHTSU, reducing the number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) to the scale of millions. In this paper, the theory of the recently-proposed 2D A-V formulation-based backward computation method is extended to calculate the critical state magnetization currents in the ten-period staggered-array BHTSU in 3D. The simulation results of the magnetization currents and the associated undulator field along the electron beam axis are compared with the well-known 3D H-formulation and the highly efficient 3D H-{\phi} formulation method, all methods showing excellent agreement with each other as well as with experimental results. The mixed H-{\phi} formulation avoids computing the eddy currents in the air subdomain and is significantly faster than the full H-formulation method, but is slower in comparison to the A-V formulation-based backward computation. Finally, the fastest and the most efficient A-V formulation in ANSYS 2020R1 Academic is adopted to optimize the integrals of the undulator field along the electron beam axis by optimizing the sizes of the end bulks.<br />Comment: 19 pages, 12 figures

Details

ISSN :
13616668 and 09532048
Volume :
34
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Superconductor Science and Technology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0b6e24c1df331ff75682430318c5ce4f