Back to Search
Start Over
Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies up to 25 April 2020 and public health implications
- Source :
- Eurosurveillance
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), 2020.
-
Abstract
- We reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests. Random-effects models yielded a summary sensitivity of 82% for IgM, and 85% for IgG and total antibodies. For specificity, the pooled estimate were 98% for IgM and 99% for IgG and total antibodies. In populations with ≤ 5% of seroconverted individuals, unless the assays have perfect (i.e. 100%) specificity, the positive predictive value would be ≤ 88%. Serological tests should be used for prevalence surveys only in hard-hit areas.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
serological tests
Epidemiology
specificity
Antibodies, Viral
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Immunoglobulin G
Serology
0302 clinical medicine
COVID-19 Testing
systematic review
030212 general & internal medicine
biology
Meta-analysis
Predictive value of tests
Antibody
Coronavirus Infections
Rapid Communication
medicine.medical_specialty
Coronaviridae Infections
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
030106 microbiology
Pneumonia, Viral
Sensitivity and Specificity
03 medical and health sciences
Betacoronavirus
Predictive Value of Tests
Virology
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Serologic Tests
Pandemics
business.industry
SARS-CoV-2
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Public health
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
COVID-19
sensitivity
Coronavirus
meta-analysis
serological test
predictive values
Immunoglobulin M
SARS-CoV2
biology.protein
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Eurosurveillance
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0c6112ba82796576b756f0e4abb6f2d0