Back to Search Start Over

An 18-month clinical evaluation of three different universal adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions

Authors :
Canan Ozturk
Reza Soleimani
Sevil Gurgan
Fatma Öz
Zeynep Bilge Kutuk
Source :
Clinical Oral Investigations. 23:1443-1452
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.

Abstract

The aim of this randomized, controlled prospective clinical trial was to evaluate and compare the performances of three different universal adhesives using a flowable universal composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) over an 18-month period. Eighteen participants recieved 99 restorations from a single operator. NCCLs were divided into three groups according to adhesive systems used: Clearfil Universal Bond (CU), iBOND Universal (IU), and G-Premio Bond (GP). No enamel bevel was placed and no mechanical retention was created for the NCCLs. Prior to adhesive procedures, selective etching was performed with 37% phosphoric acid. Adhesive systems were applied following manufacturers’ instructions and the lesions were restored with a flowable composite resin (G-aenial Universal Flo). Restorations were finished and polished immediately after placement and scored with regard to retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, sensitivity, surface texture, and color match using modified USPHS criteria after a week (baseline) and 6, 12, and 18 months. Descriptive statistics were performed using chi-square tests. The 18-month recall rate was 88.8% and retention rates for CU, IU, and GP were 100%, 96.8%, and 100%, respectively. No restorations exhibited post-operative sensitivity and secondary caries. After 18 months, CU, IU, and GP groups showed similar alpha rates for marginal adaptation (CU 93.1%, IU 90%, GP 81.8%) and marginal discoloration (CU 100%, IU 90%, GP 87.9%). A total of ten (CU 2, IU 3, GP 5) restorations exhibited bravo scores for surface texture and three (CU 2, GP 1) restorations showed bravo score for color match. No statistical differences were found among the tested adhesives for any criteria evaluated (p > 0.05). The three adhesive systems demonstrated similar performances during the 18-month follow-up in the restoration of NCCLs. Universal adhesives could be used successfully in the restoration of NCCLs.

Details

ISSN :
14363771 and 14326981
Volume :
23
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Oral Investigations
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0cbdf8d957d7835369f1b5cb85af3a8b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2571-2