One-Stage Versus Sequential Hybrid Radiofrequency Ablation: An In Vitro Evaluation

Objective To compare lesion size and depth between a 1-step, a sequential, and a delayed radio-frequency ablation in a hybrid setup. Methods Left atrium tissues obtained from fresh porcine hearts were mounted into the ABLABOX simulator. Based on the time differences between the index epicardial (epi) and consequent endocardial (endo) ablation, 3 study groups were compared: a 1-stage (SEQ- 0) group (0-minute delay), an SEQ 1 group (60-minute delay), and an SEQ 2 group (240-minute delay). During the experiment, a constant epicardial (300 gr) and endocardial (30 gr) force were applied. Per group, 20 samples were studied, and the resulting lesion size and depth were quantified with morphometric evaluation. Results Overall, no transmural lesion was obtained. Lesions in SEQ 0 had better maximum and minimum diameters ( P < 0.001), a larger total area ( P < 0.001), and volume ( P < 0.001) than SEQ 1 and SEQ 2. There was no statistical difference in morphometric parameters (all, P > 0.05) between the delayed procedures (SEQ 1 and SEQ 2). Conclusions In our in vitro model, different time sequences of combined epi–endo ablation did not result in transmural lesions. However, simultaneous epi–endo ablation produced broader and deeper lesions. Our findings need to be confirmed by further research.