Back to Search Start Over

Partial orthotopic liver transplantation in combination with two-stage hepatectomy: A proof-of-concept explained by mathematical modeling

Authors :
Eric Vibert
Irene E. Vignon-Clementel
Florian Joly
Pål-Dag Line
Nicolas Golse
Quentin Nicolas
Centre Hépato-Biliaire [Hôpital Paul Brousse] (CHB)
Hôpital Paul Brousse-Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Physiopathologie et traitement des maladies du foie
Hôpital Paul Brousse-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris-Saclay
Numerical simulation of biological flows (REO)
Sorbonne Université (SU)-Inria de Paris
Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions (LJLL (UMR_7598))
Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)
Oslo University Hospital [Oslo]
Institute of Clinical Medicine [Oslo]
Faculty of Medicine [Oslo]
University of Oslo (UiO)-University of Oslo (UiO)
Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)
BOPA_BERNOULLI
Vignon-Clementel, Irene
Source :
Clinical Biomechanics, Clinical Biomechanics, Elsevier, 2020, 77, pp.195-200. ⟨10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.01.020⟩, Clinical Biomechanics, 2020, 77, pp.195-200. ⟨10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.01.020⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

Background Resection And Partial Liver Segment 2/3 Transplantation with Delayed total hepatectomy (RAPID) includes total hepatectomy in 2 steps with small graft transplantation at first stage. To avoid graft portal hyperperfusion, portal vein pressure monitoring is required after revascularization and right portal vein clamping. To date, portal flow modulation has not been reported but simulating hemodynamics in RAPID patients would be useful to anticipate these procedures. Our team developed hemodynamic 0D modeling; we aimed to assess if this mathematical model could be accurately used in the RAPID setting. Methods The modified 0D model was retrospectively tested on 3 patients. We compared our estimated portal vein pressures and portocaval gradients to those intraoperatively measured, as indication to modulate portal flow relies on these measures. Findings Portal pressures measured after right portal vein clamping (end of RAPID procedure) in patients 1, 2 and 3 were respectively of 14, 16 and 12 mmHg while the simulated pressures were of 13.1, 14.8 and 11.5 mmHg (p = 0.25). Portocaval gradients measured after right portal vein clamping in the 3 patients were respectively of 10, 11 and 7 mmHg while the simulated gradients were of 9.9, 11.6 and 8.3 mmHg (p = 0.5). Interpretation We succeeded to predict portal vein pressures and portocaval gradients after RAPID. This promising report demonstrates that 0D simulation could be a useful tool for human decision-making. Moreover, such a patient-specific model could be of importance if we transpose RAPID experience to hepatocellular carcinoma bearing cirrhotics, a population with high probability of portal hypertension after RAPID.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02680033 and 18791271
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Biomechanics, Clinical Biomechanics, Elsevier, 2020, 77, pp.195-200. ⟨10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.01.020⟩, Clinical Biomechanics, 2020, 77, pp.195-200. ⟨10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.01.020⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0d864c2c215fcf37a4d975f8439dc820