Back to Search Start Over

Treatment strategies for reducing early and late recurrence of colonic diverticular bleeding based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage: a large multicenter study

Authors :
Maya Gobinet-Suguro
Naoyoshi Nagata
Katsumasa Kobayashi
Atsushi Yamauchi
Atsuo Yamada
Jun Omori
Takashi Ikeya
Taiki Aoyama
Naoyuki Tominaga
Yoshinori Sato
Takaaki Kishino
Naoki Ishii
Tsunaki Sawada
Masaki Murata
Akinari Takao
Kazuhiro Mizukami
Ken Kinjo
Shunji Fujimori
Takahiro Uotani
Minoru Fujita
Hiroki Sato
Sho Suzuki
Toshiaki Narasaka
Junnosuke Hayasaka
Tomohiro Funabiki
Yuzuru Kinjo
Akira Mizuki
Shu Kiyotoki
Tatsuya Mikami
Ryosuke Gushima
Hiroyuki Fujii
Yuta Fuyuno
Naohiko Gunji
Yosuke Toya
Kazuyuki Narimatsu
Noriaki Manabe
Koji Nagaike
Tetsu Kinjo
Yorinobu Sumida
Sadahiro Funakoshi
Kana Kawagishi
Tamotsu Matsuhashi
Yuga Komaki
Kuniko Miki
Kazuhiro Watanabe
Naomi Uemura
Eri Itawa
Mitushige Sugimoto
Masakatsu Fukuzawa
Takashi Kawai
Mitsuru Kaise
Takao Itoi
Source :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 95(6)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Treatment strategies for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) remain unstandardized, and no large studies have evaluated their effectiveness. We sought to identify the best strategy among combinations of SRH identification and endoscopic treatment strategies.We retrospectively analyzed 5823 CDB patients who underwent colonoscopy at 49 hospitals throughout Japan (CODE-BLUE J-Study). Three strategies were compared: find SRH (definitive CDB) and treat endoscopically, find SRH (definitive CDB) and treat conservatively, and without finding SRH (presumptive CDB) treat conservatively. In conducting pairwise comparisons of outcomes in these groups, we used propensity score-matching analysis to balance baseline characteristics between the groups being compared.Both early and late recurrent bleeding rates were significantly lower in patients with definitive CDB treated endoscopically than in those with presumptive CDB treated conservatively (30 days, 19.6% vs 26.0% [P .001]; 365 days, 33.7% vs 41.6% [P .001], respectively). In patients with definitive CDB, the early recurrent bleeding rate was significantly lower in those treated endoscopically than in those treated conservatively (17.4% vs 26.7% [P = .038] for a single test of hypothesis; however, correction for multiple testing of data removed this significance). The late recurrent bleeding rate was also lower, but not significantly, in those treated endoscopically (32.0% vs 36.1%, P = .426). Definitive CDB treated endoscopically showed significantly lower early and late recurrent bleeding rates than when treated conservatively in cases of SRH with active bleeding, nonactive bleeding, and in the right-sided colon but not left-sided colon.Treating definitive CDB endoscopically was most effective in reducing recurrent bleeding over the short and long term, compared with not treating definitive CDB or presumptive CDB. Physicians should endeavor to find and treat SRH for suspected CDB.

Details

ISSN :
10976779
Volume :
95
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0db9cbd8cb96c4045207eb24a8b41ea2