Back to Search
Start Over
Unplanned adaptations before breaking the blind
- Source :
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publication Year :
- 2012
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 2012.
-
Abstract
- Occasionally, things go so wrong in a clinical trial that a change must be made. For example, the originally planned primary outcome may be measured completely unreliably. Is there any recourse? One may still be able to salvage the trial using a permutation test if a change is made before breaking the treatment blind. The solution is not a panacea; we discuss the limitations and legitimate grounds for criticism. Still, when it is needed, the procedure is preferable to rigid adherence to a design that makes no sense. Published 2012. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
- Subjects :
- Statistics and Probability
Endpoint Determination
Epidemiology
blinded interim analysis
Public domain
01 natural sciences
Panacea (medicine)
permutation tests
010104 statistics & probability
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Primary outcome
Bias
Double-Blind Method
type I error rate control
Econometrics
Humans
Single-Blind Method
030212 general & internal medicine
0101 mathematics
Bias (Epidemiology)
Law and economics
multiple comparisons
Clinical Trials as Topic
Government
Special Issue Papers
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Epidemiologic Research Design
Sample Size
Criticism
adaptive methods
Psychology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10970258 and 02776715
- Volume :
- 31
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Statistics in Medicine
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0e1b716ccffbbf6a460679ec19a3ba1d
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5361