Back to Search Start Over

Intercomparisons of marine boundary layer cloud properties from the ARM CAP‐MBL campaign and two MODIS cloud products

Authors :
Xiquan Dong
Steven Platnick
Hua Song
Steven J. Ghan
Baike Xi
Zhibo Zhang
Patrick Minnis
Po-Lun Ma
Source :
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 122:2351-2365
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017.

Abstract

From April 2009 to December 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program carried out an observational field campaign on Graciosa Island, targeting the marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds over the Azores region. In this paper, we present an inter-comparison of the MBL cloud properties, namely, cloud liquid water path (LWP), cloud optical thickness (COT) and cloud-droplet effective radius (CER), among retrievals from the ARM mobile facility (AMF) and two Moderate Resolution Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud products (GSFC-MODIS and CERES-MODIS). A total of 63 daytime single-layer MBL cloud cases are selected for inter-comparison. Comparison of collocated retrievals indicates that the two MODIS cloud products agree well on both COT and CER retrievals, with the correlation coefficient R>0.95. despite their significant difference in spatial sampling. In both MODIS products, the CER retrievals based on the 2.1 µm band (CER(2.1)) is significantly smaller than that based on the 3.7 µm band (CER(3.7)). The GSFC-MODIS cloud product is collocated and compared with ground-based ARM observations at several temporal-spatial scales. In general, the correlation increases with more precise collocation. For the 63 selected MBL cloud cases, the GSFC-MODIS LWP and COT retrievals agree reasonably well with the ground-based observations with no apparent bias and correlation coefficient R around 0.85 and 0.70, respectively. However, GSFC-MODIS CER(3.7) and CER(2.1) retrievals have a lower correlation (R~0.5) with the ground-based retrievals. For the 63 selected cases, they are on average larger than ground observations by about 1.5 µm and 3.0 µm, respectively. Taking into account that the MODIS CER retrievals are only sensitive to cloud top reduces the bias only by 0.5 µm.

Details

ISSN :
21698996 and 2169897X
Volume :
122
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0e30a89e03b0b4376794e36ed7b182fe
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025763