Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of a new, rapid, and quantitative D-Dimer test in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

Authors :
Emmanuel Oger
Dominique Mottier
Christophe Leroyer
Jean Amiral
Y Bizais
P Ill
Michel Nonent
M Grimaux
JF Abgrall
J Clavier
E Le Moigne
Luc Bressollette
Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale (GETBO)
Université de Brest (UBO)-Institut Brestois Santé Agro Matière (IBSAM)
Université de Brest (UBO)-Université de Brest (UBO)
Département de Médecine Interne et Pneumologie [Brest] (DMIP - Brest)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (CHRU Brest)
Département de radiologie [Brest] (DR - Brest)
Service de médecine nucléaire [Brest]
Hôpital Morvan [Brest]-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (CHRU Brest)
CHRU Brest - Service d'Hématologie (CHU-Brest-Hemato)
Calvez, Ghislaine
Source :
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, American Thoracic Society, 1998, 158 (1), pp.65-70
Publication Year :
1998
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 1998.

Abstract

International audience; Previous studies have suggested the utility of D-Dimer ELISA assays in eliminating a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Our objectives were to evaluate the performance of a new, rapid, quantitative, and automated Liatest D-Dimer Assay in patients with suspected PE. Three hundred eighty-six consecutive patients referred to our institution between March 1992 and December 1996 for clinically suspected PE, with recent clinical signs not exceeding 1 wk, were included in this study. Diagnosis of PE was based on clinical evaluation, radionuclide lung imaging, lower limb examination, and, when required, pulmonary angiography. D-Dimer performances, for both Liatest D-Dimer and standard D-Dimer ELISA (Asserachrom DDi), assays, were assessed at the end of the study. Among the 386 patients tested, 146 (37.8%) were classified as PE-positive. Liatest D-Dimer assay had a 100% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 97 to 100%) and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% confidence interval, 94 to 100%). A normal result, below the cutoff of 500 ng/ml, occurred in 83 of the 386 (21%) patients. There was a strong agreement between Liatest D-Dimer and Asserachrom DDi analyses. These findings suggest that this rapid, quantitative, and automated D-Dimer assay provides a useful diagnostic tool for the clinician with regard to exclusion of PE.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1073449X and 15354970
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, American Thoracic Society, 1998, 158 (1), pp.65-70
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0e7e879fd1e6437d29c268678084ba86