Back to Search Start Over

Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images

Authors :
Daniela Euba
Elisabeth Pfaehler
Josée M. Zijlstra
Joyce van Sluis
Ronald Boellaard
Otto S. Hoekstra
Andreas Rinscheid
Adrienne H. Brouwers
Constantin Lapa
Radiology and nuclear medicine
CCA - Imaging and biomarkers
Hematology
Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging
​Basic and Translational Research and Imaging Methodology Development in Groningen (BRIDGE)
Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS)
Source :
EJNMMI PHYSICS, 9(1):53. Springer International Publishing AG, Pfaehler, E, Euba, D, Rinscheid, A, Hoekstra, O S, Zijlstra, J, van Sluis, J, Brouwers, A H, Lapa, C & Boellaard, R 2022, ' Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images ', EJNMMI PHYSICS, vol. 9, no. 1, 53 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00468-w, EJNMMI physics, 9(1):53. SpringerOpen
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background Machine learning studies require a large number of images often obtained on different PET scanners. When merging these images, the use of harmonized images following EARL-standards is essential. However, when including retrospective images, EARL accreditation might not have been in place. The aim of this study was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) that can identify retrospectively if an image is EARL compliant and if it is meeting older or newer EARL-standards. Materials and methods 96 PET images acquired on three PET/CT systems were included in the study. All images were reconstructed with the locally clinically preferred, EARL1, and EARL2 compliant reconstruction protocols. After image pre-processing, one CNN was trained to separate clinical and EARL compliant reconstructions. A second CNN was optimized to identify EARL1 and EARL2 compliant images. The accuracy of both CNNs was assessed using fivefold cross-validation. The CNNs were validated on 24 images acquired on a PET scanner not included in the training data. To assess the impact of image noise on the CNN decision, the 24 images were reconstructed with different scan durations. Results In the cross-validation, the first CNN classified all images correctly. When identifying EARL1 and EARL2 compliant images, the second CNN identified 100% EARL1 compliant and 85% EARL2 compliant images correctly. The accuracy in the independent dataset was comparable to the cross-validation accuracy. The scan duration had almost no impact on the results. Conclusion The two CNNs trained in this study can be used to retrospectively include images in a multi-center setting by, e.g., adding additional smoothing. This method is especially important for machine learning studies where the harmonization of images from different PET systems is essential.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21977364
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
EJNMMI PHYSICS, 9(1):53. Springer International Publishing AG, Pfaehler, E, Euba, D, Rinscheid, A, Hoekstra, O S, Zijlstra, J, van Sluis, J, Brouwers, A H, Lapa, C & Boellaard, R 2022, ' Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images ', EJNMMI PHYSICS, vol. 9, no. 1, 53 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00468-w, EJNMMI physics, 9(1):53. SpringerOpen
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0e9b724032d1879f3166b2662adec8f8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00468-w