Back to Search Start Over

Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses

Authors :
Clara Suemi Costa Rosa
Heitor Siqueira Ribeiro
Barbara Perez Vogt
Giorgos K. Sakkas
Henrique Luiz Monteiro
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Brasília
University of Maia
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
University of Thessaly
Cardiff Metropolitan University
Source :
Scopus, Repositório Institucional da UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), instacron:UNESP
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley, 2021.

Abstract

Made available in DSpace on 2022-05-01T11:54:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2021-01-01 Background: There are many consensuses to diagnose sarcopenia, and their agreement in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) is not clear. We described the sarcopenia prevalence in patients receiving HD using different consensuses and analyzed their level of agreement. Methods: Sixty-seven patients (43 men, 55 ± 14.6 years) were evaluated for appendicular skeletal muscle mass using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and muscle strength using handgrip strength. Patients were classified according to different sarcopenia consensuses (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People [EWGSOP], Revised EWGSOP [EWGSOP2], Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Project [FNIH], and Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 [AWGS2]). Kappa analysis identified the level of agreement. Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 1.5% to 11.9% depending on the sarcopenia consensus. The agreement between the different consensuses ranged from poor to almost perfect. FNIH and EWGSOP showed the lowest agreement (κ = 0.20; 95% CI, −0.14 to 0.54; P < 0.05), whereas EWGSOP2 and AWGS2 had the largest κ = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P < 0.001). When stratified by age (≥60 years), the sarcopenia prevalence was higher in the older group (27% vs 2%; P = 0.004). In addition, male participants seemed to be more prone to sarcopenia compared with female counterparts, but this difference was not statistically confirmed (16% vs 4%; P = 0.242). Conclusion: The sarcopenia consensuses showed from poor to almost perfect agreement, which varied the sarcopenia prevalence rates in patients receiving HD. EWGSOP2 and AWGS2 showed the largest agreement. Department of Physical Education São Paulo State University Faculty of Physical Education University of Brasília Research Center in Sports Sciences Health Sciences and Human Development University of Maia Graduate Program in Health Sciences School of Medicine Federal University of Uberlandia School of Physical Education Sport Science and Dietetics University of Thessaly School of Sport and Health Sciences Cardiff Metropolitan University Department of Physical Education São Paulo State University

Details

ISSN :
19412452 and 08845336
Volume :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0e9bf9a09be6386a157ac19b4afd6c7b