Back to Search Start Over

The association of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and the hippocampal volumes in healthy humans: a joint meta-analysis of published and new data

Authors :
Dominique J.-F. de Quervain
Virginie Freytag
Tobias Vogel
Klara Spalek
David Coynel
Kerstin Bendfeldt
Renata Smieskova
Fabienne Harrisberger
Leo Gschwind
Stefan Borgwardt
Anna Walter
André Schmidt
Andreas Papassotiropoulos
Annette Milnik
Matthias Fastenrath
Source :
Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 42
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

BackgroundThe brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism (refSNP Cluster Report: rs6265) is a common and functionally relevant single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). The gene itself, as well as the SNP rs6265, have been implicated in hippocampal learning and memory. However, imaging genetic studies have produced controversial results about the impact of this SNP on hippocampal volumes in healthy subjects.MethodsWe examined the association between the rs6265 polymorphism and hippocampal volume in 643 healthy young subjects using automatic segmentation and subsequently included these data in a meta-analysis based on published studies with 5298 healthy subjects in total.ResultsWe found no significant association between SNP rs6265 and hippocampal volumes in our sample (g=0.05, p=0.58). The meta-analysis revealed a small, albeit significant difference in hippocampal volumes between genotype groups, such that Met-carriers had slightly smaller hippocampal volumes than Val/Val homozygotes (g=0.09, p=0.04), an association that was only evident when manual (g=0.22, p=0.01) but not automatic tracing approaches (g=0.04, p=0.38) were used. Studies using manual tracing showed evidence for publication bias and a significant decrease in effect size over the years with increasing sample sizes.ConclusionsThis study does not support the association between SNP rs6265 and hippocampal volume in healthy individuals. The weakly significant effect observed in the meta-analysis is mainly driven by studies with small sample sizes. In contrast, our original data and the meta-analysis of automatically segmented hippocampal volumes, which was based on studies with large samples sizes, revealed no significant genotype effect. Thus, meta-analyses of the association between rs6265 and hippocampal volumes should consider possible biases related to measuring technique and sample size.

Details

ISSN :
18737528
Volume :
42
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0f533a6e9861ba4a2c617bfcf06b1041