Back to Search Start Over

Effects of voluntary activity on the excitability of motor axons in the peroneal nerve

Authors :
Cindy S.-Y. Lin
Satoshi Kuwabara
David Burke
Ilona Mogyoros
Cecilia Cappelen-Smith
Source :
Musclenerve. 25(2)
Publication Year :
2002

Abstract

To investigate whether there are inter-nerve differences in the extent and pattern of axonal excitability changes produced by voluntary contractions of tibialis anterior (TA) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB), threshold tracking was used to measure axonal excitability parameters [threshold, supernormality and strength-duration time constant (τSD)] of peroneal and median motor axons in 11 healthy subjects. Maximal contractions for 1 min resulted in an increase in threshold, an increase in supernormality, a decrease in τSD and an increase in latency, all of which indicate axonal hyperpolarization. The increase in threshold was less in peroneal axons (18 ± 4%) than median axons (37 ± 6%, mean ± SEM, P < 0.001), and was accompanied by smaller absolute changes in latency, supernormality, and τSD. Peroneal axons had less supernormality at rest but a greater change in supernormality for the change in threshold. There were major contraction-induced changes in the compound muscle action potential of TA but not that of APB. Voluntary contractions depress axonal excitability, but the changes are quantitatively different for motor axons innervating different muscles. There are three clinical implications. First, weakness and fatigue due to activity-dependent conduction block may vary for different muscles, independent of disease severity, and therapeutic strategies to overcome activity-dependent conduction block may not be equally effective for different muscles. Second, in motor control studies using the H reflex to document motoneuron excitability, a constant stimulus will not produce a constant neural volley if the stimulated axons have been activated by, for example, a voluntary contraction. Third, TA is probably not optimal for testing for activity-dependent conduction block. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 25: 176–184, 2002 DOI 10.1002/mus.10030

Details

ISSN :
0148639X
Volume :
25
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Musclenerve
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....100aa2730e72b442352d3f072e42b946