Hemidactylus sataraensis Giri & Bauer, 2008, sp. nov

Hemidactylus sataraensis sp. nov. Figs. 1���9 Holotype��� Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai (BNHS) 1743, adult female; under a rock near Chalakewadi, Satara District, Maharashtra, India (17 �� 34 ��� 40 ��� N, 73 �� 49 ��� 28 ��� E) on 22 January, 2006. Collected by Varad Giri, Dilipkumar Dongare and Rajan More. Paratype ��� BNHS 1742 collected from the same locality on 18 September 2005 by Varad Giri, Dilipkumar Dongare, V. Y. Deshpande, Yashodhan Parakhe and Rajan More. Diagnosis ��� A small sized Hemidactylus, snout-vent length at least 46.4 mm. Back with small, keeled and granular scales, intermixed with irregularly arranged, enlarged keeled tubercles (Fig. 4). First supralabial touching nasal (Fig. 5). Two well developed postmentals, the inner pair is larger and in extensive contact behind the mental. Ventrolateral folds very feebly developed, about 26���28 scale rows across venter between lowest rows of tubercles. Free distal phalanx of all digits short and about half as long as its lamellar pad (dilated portion); ten to eleven enlarged scansors beneath fourth toe of pes, of which the penultimate and two more proximal plates are notched but undivided (Fig. 6). Original tail depressed, oval in transverse section, constricted at base, swollen distal to constriction, then tapering to a fine point, with a median dorsal furrow; scales on the tail much larger than dorsals of body, smooth, strongly imbricate, with a series of two or four longitudinal series of enlarged, keeled scales on either side of the median dorsal furrow (Fig. 7). Coloration highly distinctive, dark background colour with pale yellow to bright white paravertebral and lateral stripes and orangish-red to brown or buff oval spots on the head, dorsum, flanks and limbs (Figs. 1, 3, 8���9). Venter white with pronounced blackish longitudinal stripes and throat and chin markings (Fig. 2). Hemidactylus sataraensis may be distinguished from all other mainland Indian congeners on the basis of (sympatric taxa with differing or non-overlapping character states indicated parenthetically): free distal phalanx of all digits short, less than half as long as corresponding dilated portion of subdigital pad, subdigital lamellae undivided except for the penultimate and two or three more proximal plates which are notched (subdigital lamellae undivided in H. anamallensis; free distal phalanx of all digits at least half as long as subdigital pad, subdigital lamellae divided in H. maculatus, H. persicus, H. porbandarensis, H. triedrus, H. subtriedrus, H. brookii, H. prashadi, H. leschenaultii, H. flaviviridis, H. giganteus, H. aaronbaueri, H. bowringii; only distal phalanx of digit I short, lamellae divided in H. frenatus, H.garnotii, H. karenorum), back with small, keeled and granular scales, intermixed with irregularly arranged, enlarged keeled tubercles, smaller than those on belly (back with uniform, imbricate, slightly elongated, striated and feebly keeled scales, a little larger than those on the belly in H. scabriceps; back with small irregular scales and 10 to 20 longitudinal series of more or less oval, strongly keeled tubercles in H. gracilis; with small, more-or-less erect, keeled granules, intermixed with larger pointed, keeled tubercles in H. reticulatus). This new species is most similar in general appearance to Hemidactylus albofasciatus, but differs with respect to (H. albofasciatus versus H. sataraensis): maximum size (36 versus 46 mm maximum SVL), tail (round in section, tapering, verticillate, covered above with faintly keeled, pointed, imbricate scales, two longitudinal rows of larger, pointed, keeled scales on either side of median furrow versus smooth, pointed, strongly imbricate scales, two to four rows of much larger, pointed, keeled scales on either side of median furrow), scansors beneath the fourth toe (9 versus 10���11). The new species also differs markedly from T. albofasciatus in dorsal and ventral colour pattern. Hemidactylus sataraensis sp. nov. is similar in colour pattern to the Pakistani species Teratolepis fasciata (currently under taxonomic revision and known to be embedded within Hemidactylus, Bauer et al. 2008), but differs from this species in its less broadly-dialated and more finelyscaled tail, absence of imbricating scales on the dorsum and flanks, and more vibrant coloration. Description ��� The holotype is in generally good condition. The body shape somewhat dorsoventrally flattened. The terminal portion of the tail is slightly bent as an artefact of preservation (Fig. 1). The skin on the belly is bit loose. Mouth is slightly open. The paratype is likewise in good condition, although the tail has been broken after preservation (Fig. 3). The description is based chiefly on the holotype; the paratype differs significantly form the holotype only in features indicated. Head short (HL/SVL ratio 0.27), wide (HW/HL ratio 0.21), not strongly depressed (HH/HL ratio 0.47), and markedly distinct from neck. Loreal region slightly inflated, canthus rostralis not prominent. Snout short (SE/HL ratio 0.39); longer than eye diameter (OD/SE ratio 0.46); scales on snout and fore head granular, keeled, larger than those on occipital region, which are smaller and granular; scales on canthus rostralis slightly larger than those on snout and keeled (Fig. 5). Eye small (OD/HL ratio 0.18); pupil vertical with crenulated margins; supraciliaries small, pointed, those at the anterior end of orbit slightly larger. Ear opening semicircular and small; eye to ear distance much greater than diameter of eye (EE/OD ratio 2.00). Rostral slightly wider (1.9 mm) than deep (1.2 mm), incompletely divided dorsally by weakly developed rostral groove; one enlarged supranasal, internasal single and slightly smaller than supranasal, two postnasals, of which the posterior is larger; rostral in contact with nostril, supralabial I, supranasal, and internasal; nostrils circular, each surrounded by supranasal, rostral, supralabial I and postnasals; 2-3 rows of scales separate orbit from supralabials. Mental triangular; two pairs of postmentals, inner pair single, larger and in contact behind mental; there is a scar on right inner postmental which vaguely continues anteriorly onto the mental; outer postmental small, half the length of the inner; inner postmental bordered anteriorly by first infralabial, medially by mental, anterolaterally by postmental and posterolaterally by a series of three enlarged chin shields, of which the anteriormost, which also contacts the outer postmental, is slightly larger; outer postmental bordered anteriorly by first and second infralabials, medially by inner mental and laterally by four chin shields. Infralabials bordered by a row of equal sized enlarged scales. Supralabials (to midorbital position) 7 (right) ��� 7 (left); supralabials (to angle of jaw) 9 (right) - 9 (left); infralabials (to angle of jaw) 7 (right) - 7 (left). Body moderately elongate (TRL/SVL ratio 0.54), with inconspicuous ventrolateral folds without denticulate scales. Dorsal scales heterogeneous, with small, keeled granules, intermixed with irregularly arranged, slightly larger, trihedral tubercles extending from occipital region to tail; tubercles more or less uniform across dorsum, somewhat less prominent on flanks (Fig. 4); 2-4 smaller scales between two adjacent enlarged tubercles. Ventral scales larger than dorsal, smooth, roughly pentagonal to rounded, imbricate, a bit larger on abdomen than on chest (Fig. 3); midbody scale rows across belly to lowest row of tubercles 27; gular region with still smaller and granular scales, anterior gular scales are much larger than the rest. There are no precloacal or femoral pores. Scales on palm and sole smooth, rounded; scales on dorsal aspect of fore limb larger than trihedral tubercles on the back, keeled, imbricate; those on the hind limbs heterogeneous, larger than those on the back, intermixed with still larger trihedral tubercles. Fore- and hindlimbs relatively short, stout; forearm short (FL/SVL ratio 0.13); tibia short (CL/SVL ratio 0.15); digits moderately short, strongly clawed; all digits of manus and digits I-IV of pes indistinctly webbed, moderately dilated; terminal phalanx of all digits curved, arising angularly from distal portion of expanded lamellar pad, short ��� less than half as long as associated toepad; scansors beneath each toe undivided, the lamella adjacent to terminal scansor is, however, deeply notched and the two next proximal lamellae are less strongly so (Fig. 6); scansors from proximal most at least twice diameter of palmar scales to distalmost divided/notched scansor: 5-7 - 7 - 7 - 7 (right manus), 6-7 - 8-9 - 7 (right pes) in holotype, 6 - 6-8 - 8 - 8 (right manus), 6-7 - 8-9 - 7 (right pes) in paratype. Relative length of digits (measurements in mm in parentheses): IV (3.15)> III (2.94)> II (2.87)> IV (2.86)> I (2.54) (right manus); IV (4.30)> III (3.81)> V (3.50)> II (3.28)> I (2.31) (right pes). Tail strongly constricted at base, notably swollen distal to constriction, tapering to a fine point, tubercular, with a median dorsal furrow, original portion of tail (18.8 mm) slightly depressed, oval in section, flat beneath; regenerated portion (13.60 mm) not depressed; length of partly regenerated tail less than snout-vent length (TL/SVL ratio 0.70); original part of the tail covered above with large (much larger than those on the dorsum), smooth, pointed, strongly imbricate scales; a series of two to four rows of much larger, pointed, keeled scales on either side of median furrow, beginning on swollen part; constricted portion is covered above with small scales with larger keeled and pointed scales, which are continued from dorsum (Fig. 7); ventral scales much larger than above, smooth, pointed and strongly imbricate; one enlarged cloacal spur on either side of tail base. Regenerated portion of tail is covered above with small, pointed, smooth scales, without enlarged keeled scales, below with smaller (than original portion) imbricate, smooth scales. Mensural data (holotype / paratype; in mm). SVL 46.4 / 40.8; TRL 24.9 / 18.8; BW 11.8 / 8.4; TL (including regenerated portion) 32.4 /36.0; TW 6.3 / 6.4; FL 6.2 / 5.9; CL 7.0/ 6.2; HL 12.5 / 12.1; HW 9.8 / 8.2; HH 5.8 / 5.3; OD 2.2 / 2.3; EE 4.5 / 3.6; SE 4.9 / 4.7; NE 3.7 / 3.6; IO 4.2 / 3.8; IN 1.6 / 1.3. Coloration (in preservative) ���Dorsal background coloration reddish-brown. A pair of prominent, narrow, cream paravertebral stripes extending from the occiput, where each terminates in a white circular spot, to the sacrum, where they converge somewhat, and onto the original portion of the tail (Fig. 1). A series of eight oval markings along the dorsal midline between the pale stripes (nine in paratype; Fig. 3); each oval pale orange with a narrow dark brown border; anterior two ovals above shoulder and in close proximity, with dark borders in contact; sacral marking smaller than others, rounded, contacting both paravertebral stripes; central five ovals subequal and evenly spaced along the body axis. A similar series of oval spots lateral to each paravertebral stripe; seven on left side, eight on right; anteriormost at level of occiput; ovals above shoulder small, increasing in size onto posterior trunk, smaller again over sacrum; each approximately equal in size to corresponding vertebral oval marking. Lateral rows of ovals bordered laterally by a thick, cream colored stripe that bears a series of irregular, dark reddish brown longitudinal dashes and short stripes. Dorsum of head reddish brown. Lateral pale body stripes continue onto head, becoming narrower and brighter white, passing above ear and through orbit to rostral scale. Pale lateral stripes bordered below by a thick, dark brown stripe that passes above the ear and through the ventral part of the orbit onto the snout. Posterior to the angle of the jaw a dark narrow stripe passes obliquely beneath the ear opening and onto the anterior forelimb insertion. A second narrow dark stripe parallels the first and extends from the posterior lower jaw onto the ventrolateral margin of the neck (Fig. 5). A few small, irregular brown spots occupy the whitish area between these dark stripes and between the dorsal of the stripes and the lower margin of the broad dark lateral stripe. A posteriorly bowed, cream band extending across parietal region from one white lateral stripe to the other, just anterior to the level of the ear. Another, similarly bowed, more whitish transverse band just anterior to eyes, and a third, narrower, straighter band halfway between anterior margin of orbit and tip of snout. Addition, less regular and less pronounced whitish markings above eyes and between the two antorbital transverse bands. In paratype there are two light transverse markings between the occipital and antorbital bands. These, along with the occipital band are incomplete, each consisting of a series of three discrete, darkedged spots representing the continuation of the three rows of ovals of the body dorsum onto the head. Upper half of supralabials and lower half of infralabials with dark brown markings; labial margins pale except for first and second supralabials and rostral. Forelimbs predominately reddish brown with irregular, narrow white bands above and below elbows and on hands and digits. Beneath mostly buff above elbow, irregularly striped below elbow, with scattered dark flecks on the base of the palm and distal subdigital scansors. Hindlimbs mottled dark brown on a buff background, resulting in pale, irregular spots above and below knee and alternating banding on feet and digits (Fig. 7). Beneath with mottling continuing on thigh and faint dark stripes on shank; scattered fine dark punctuations on sole and subdigital scansors. Light markings on dorsum of limbs forming more discrete spots in paratype. Tail dorsum dark reddish brown with a pair of whitish-cream paravertebral stripes and a pair of similar lateral stripes continuing from sacrum. Enlarged, flattened, triangular scales between paravertebral and lateral stripes also whitish, yielding broad, incomplete transverse bands on original portion of tail. Regenerated portion of tail similiarly striped, but lacking enlarged whitish scales and resulting transverse markings (Fig. 7). Body venter greyish-buff, semi-translucent, bearing approximately seven, more-or-less complete narrow, brownish longitudinal stripes. Midventral stripe continues across groin and vent and onto tail. Tail venter with a series of five narrow, charcoal stripes, midventral boldest, paraxial faintes, lateral pair intermediate in definition (Fig. 2). Venter of chin whitish with numerous faint brown markings, mostly longitudinally oriented. A midventral brown stripe extends from anterior portion of mental scale onto anterior chin shields. Coloration (in life) ��� Holotype with dark, almost black dorsal background coloration (Fig. 8). Pale paravertebral and lateral stripes a dull pale yellow, lateral stripes on head bright white. Dorsal oval spots and dorsal head markings orangish-red, bolder along vertebral line and on head, lateral rows of ovals and markings on tail and limbs paler. Pale banding on limbs whitish to pale rose. Venter white with pronounced blackish longitudinal stripes and throat and chin markings. Paratype with background color less dark: dark brown to dark reddish-brown with blackish margins surrounding dorsal ovals (Fig. 9). Ovals and other light markings duller orangish-red, becoming buff faintly tinted with orange on the shoulders, limbs and head. Paler stripes on tail dull reddish-brown alternating with dark brown, almost blackish ground colour. Enlarged scales of tail dorsum a pale yellowish-buff. Iris silvery. Etymology ���The species is named for Satara, the district in the Indian State of Maharashtra within which the type locality is located. Distribution ��� At present this species is only known from the type locality, which lies in the south-central part of the Western Ghats of Maharashtra (Fig. 10). This region is unique in the presence of large laterite or basaltic plateaus on the crests of mountains. Mostly semi-evergreen forest characterises the valley vegetation. Most of the plateaus support sparse vegetation, which is mostly evident in monsoon and in summer they look barren. Apart from their unique ecological features, these plateaus have a unique floral and faunal diversity. The herpetofaunal species seen on these plateaus are mostly the representatives of drier regions such as Ophisops sp., Lygosoma sp. and Echis carinata. But a few plateaus are also home to some unique and uncommon species of amphibians including Bufo koynayensis and Indotyphlus maharashtraensis (Giri et al. 2004, pers. obs.). At present, this species appears restricted to the type locality. It has not been seen on other plateaus near the study area. Natural history ��� The type locality is a well known tourist destination due to the presence of windmills on the plateau (Fig. 11). The holotype was caught during daylight hours (10 h 30) under a small rock on an extensive rocky slope which is bordered by sparse vegetation. The gecko was seen sitting in an ���S��� shape and remained motionless after its covering rock was removed, making no effort to escape. The paratype was collected from the same locality in a heap of small rocks. It was quite active. Locals indicated that this gecko is always found under rocks and that it is commonly seen in the drier months of the year. This is reflected in the fact that first author visited this locality twice, once in monsoon and second visit was in winter and encountered only the two type specimens. Two eggs (minimum maximum dimension 6 mm as measured through intact body wall) were seen in the holotype which was collected in November 2007, suggesting that this is the breeding season for this species and that oviposition occurs in early winter. The types were found sympatrically with H. cf. brookii and Sitana ponticeriana. Discussion ��� Carraza and Arnold (2006) established patterns of relationship among several major groups within Hemidactylus. This study, however, did not sample the majority of Indian species and of those sampled, none were endemic. The smaller size, relatively elongated body and unique toe morphology indicates that this is a member of the ground dwelling group of Hemidactylus. These characters are also present in H. gracilis, H. reticulatus and H. albofasciatus, as well as the Indus Delta plain species Teratolepis fasciata (taxonomy of this species is under revision, Bauer et al. 2008). All of these taxa are ground dwelling and mostly found sheltering under rocks or other cover objects on the ground (Smith, 1935, Grandison & Soman 1963; Anderson 1964; Tikader & Sharma 1992; Bauer et al. 2005). Together these species form a monophyletic group (Bauer et al. 2008) to which H. sataraensis probably also belongs. Based on superficial resemblance, scale pattern, and overlapping numbers of supralabials and digital scansors, H. sataraensis may be most closely allied to H. albofasciatus or perhaps T. fasciata. Apart from differences in mo
Published as part of Giri, Varad B. & Bauer, Aaron M., 2008, A new ground-dwelling Hemidactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Maharashtra, with a key to the Hemidactylus of India, pp. 21-34 in Zootaxa 1700 on pages 22-31, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.180794
{"references":["Bauer, A. M., Giri, V. B., Greenbaum, E., Jackman, T. R., Dharne, M. S. & Shouche, Y. S. (2008) On the systematics of the gekkonid genus Teratolepis Gunther, 1869: another one bites the dust. Hamadryad, 32, 13 - 27.","Carranza, S. & Arnold, E. N. (2006) Systematics, biogeography, and evolution of Hemidactylus geckos (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) elucidated using mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 38, 531 - 545.","Smith, M. A. (1935) The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia. Vol. II. - Sauria. Taylor and Francis, London. xiii + 440 pp., 2 folding maps, 1 pl.","Grandison, A. G. C. & Soman, P. W. (1963) Description of a new geckonid lizard from Maharashtra, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 60, 322 - 325, pls. I - II.","Anderson, J. A. (1964) A report on the gecko Teratolepis fasciata (Blyth, 1853). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 61, 161 - 171.","Tikader, B. K. & Sharma, R. C. (1992) Handbook of Indian Lizards. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta. xv + 250 pp., 42 pls.","Bauer, A. M., Giri, V., Kehimkar, S. & Agarwal, I. (2005) Notes on Hemidactylus gracilis Blanford 1870, a poorly known Indian gecko. Gekko, 4 (2), 2 - 7.","Minton, S. A., Jr. (1966) A contribution to the herpetology of West Pakistan. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 134, 27 - 184, pls. 9 - 36.","Mertens, R. (1969) Die Amphibien und Reptilien West-Pakistans. Suttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, 197, 1 - 96.","Jerdon, T. C. (1853) Catalogue of reptiles inhabiting the peninsular of India. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 22, 462 - 479, 522 - 534.","Theobald, W. (1876) Descriptive Catalogue of the Reptiles of British India. Thacker, Spink and Co., Calcutta. x + 238 + xxxviii + xiii pp.","Das, I., Dattagupta, B & Gayen, N. C. (1998) History and catalogue of reptile types in the collection of the Zoological Survey of India. Journal of South Asian Natural History, 3, 121 - 172.","Giri, V., Wilkinson, M. & Gower, D. J. (2003) A new species of Gegeneophis Peters (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) from southern Maharashtra, India, with a key to the species of the genus. Zootaxa, 351, 1 - 10.","Ravichandran, M. S., Gower, D. J. & Wilkinson, M. (2003) A new species of Gegeneophis Peters (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) from Maharashtra, India. Zootaxa, 350, 1 - 8.","Rodgers, W. A. & Panwar, H. S. (1988) Planning a Wildlife Protected Area Network in India Vol. II. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun. 267 pp."]}