Back to Search Start Over

Integrating scientific and local knowledge to address conservation conflicts: Towards a practical framework based on lessons learned from a Scottish case study

Authors :
Stephen M. Redpath
Chris V. Wernham
Mark Wilson
Juliette Young
Gillian B. Ainsworth
Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, UK
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QB, UK
Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Campus Vida, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruna, Spain
British Trust for Ornithology, Unit 15, Beta Centre, Stirling University Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK
Agroécologie [Dijon]
Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Source :
Environmental Science & Policy, Environmental Science & Policy, 2020, 107, pp.46-55. ⟨10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.017⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

National audience; Integrating local knowledge with scientific knowledge can offer significant benefits to improving environmental decision-making. However, this is especially challenging in environmental conflict situations where advice is lacking, and no single approach can foster conflict transformation. To understand stakeholder knowledge and its integration in a conflict transformation process in Scotland, we brought together diverse stakeholder organisations and encouraged power sharing in the project’s management. Our mixed-methods approach was based on theories of community science, knowledge co-production, knowledge integration and implementation and conflict transformation. We gathered stakeholder perceptions to see where local and scientific knowledge converged and diverged. Stakeholders holding opposing views mutually prioritised knowledge gaps and identified future collaborative actions. Building upon lessons learned, we present a practical framework and associated considerations to realise knowledge integration goals in conservation conflict situations. This framework is widely applicable, especially in situations where disputes over the evidence-base prevent positive outcomes for people and nature.

Details

ISSN :
14629011
Volume :
107
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Environmental Science & Policy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....10d5c0e41cd058d7ff44ccbaf0fe36a7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.017