Back to Search Start Over

Smartwatch Electrocardiogram and Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Cardiac-Rhythm Safety of Drug Therapy in the COVID-19 Pandemic. The QT-logs study

Authors :
Jagmeet P. Singh
Jérôme Hourdain
Baptiste Maille
M. Zabern
E. Martinez
Christophe Gardella
Hervé Tissot-Dupont
Matthieu Million
Jean-Claude Deharo
L. Fiorina
Linda Koutbi-Franceschi
Marie Wilkin
Noémie Resseguier
Frédéric Franceschi
Centre d'études et de recherche sur les services de santé et la qualité de vie (CEReSS)
Aix Marseille Université (AMU)
Source :
International Journal of Cardiology, International Journal of Cardiology, Elsevier, 2021, ⟨10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.002⟩, International Journal of Cardiology, 2021, ⟨10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.002⟩
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2021.

Abstract

Background QTc interval monitoring, for the prevention of drug-induced arrhythmias is necessary, especially in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For the provision of widespread use, surrogates for 12‑lead ECG QTc assessment may be useful. This prospective observational study compared QTc duration assessed by artificial intelligence (AI-QTc) (Cardiologs®, Paris, France) on smartwatch single‑lead electrocardiograms (SW-ECGs) with those measured on 12‑lead ECGs, in patients with early stage COVID-19 treated with a hydroxychloroquine−azithromycin regimen. Methods Consecutive patients with COVID-19 who needed hydroxychloroquine−azithromycin therapy, received a smartwatch (Withings Move ECG®, Withings, France). At baseline, day-6 and day-10, a 12‑lead ECG was recorded, and a SW-ECG was transmitted thereafter. Throughout the drug regimen, a SW-ECG was transmitted every morning at rest. Agreement between manual QTc measurement on a 12‑lead ECG and AI-QTc on the corresponding SW-ECG was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. Results 85 patients (30 men, mean age 38.3 ± 12.2 years) were included in the study. Fair agreement between manual and AI-QTc values was observed, particularly at day-10, where the delay between the 12‑lead ECG and the SW-ECG was the shortest (−2.6 ± 64.7 min): 407 ± 26 ms on the 12‑lead ECG vs 407 ± 22 ms on SW-ECG, bias −1 ms, limits of agreement −46 ms to +45 ms; the difference between the two measures was<br />Highlights • Artificial intelligence fairly interpreted QTc • Single lead smartwatch ECG is an option for home monitoring ECG • Because of social distancing necessity with COVID-19, home monitoring ECG is crucial.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01675273 and 18741754
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Cardiology, International Journal of Cardiology, Elsevier, 2021, ⟨10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.002⟩, International Journal of Cardiology, 2021, ⟨10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.002⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1133944c2c553cd20cdd5a57a91fa3a8