Back to Search Start Over

A prospective study to validate the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-induced dermatologic toxicities FACT-EGFRI 18 questionnaire: SWOG S1013

Authors :
Mario E. Lacouture
Michael J. Fisch
Justin D. Floyd
Gary V. Burton
Kathryn B. Arnold
Mario R. Velasco
Lynne I. Wagner
Heinz-Josef Lenz
Marianna Koczywas
Joseph M. Unger
James L. Wade
Afsaneh Barzi
N. Lynn Henry
Siu-Fun Wong
Dawn L. Hershman
Carol M. Moinpour
Benjamin Esparaz
Anna Moseley
Shaker R. Dakhil
Keisha C. Humphries
Source :
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020), Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
SpringerOpen, 2020.

Abstract

Background Papulopustular rash is a common class effect of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) that can affect patients’ health-related quality of life and cause disruptions to treatment. SWOG S1013 (NCT01416688) is a multi-center study designed to validate the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy EGFRI 18 (FACT-EGFRI 18) using 7-items from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 to assess EGFRI-induced skin-related toxicities and their impact on functional status. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal or lung cancer to receive EGFRI therapies for at least 6 weeks were enrolled. Patient self-assessments using the FACT-EGFRI 18 were completed prior to undergoing CTCAE assessment by trained clinicians at baseline, weekly × 6, and then monthly × 3. The psychometric properties of the FACT-EGFRI 14 (skin toxicity items only) and 18 (plus 2 nail and 2 hair items) were established based on criterion validity, known groups validity, internal consistency reliability, and responsiveness to change. Results Of the 146 registered patients, 124 were evaluable. High Cronbach’s alpha (> 0.70) for both FACT-EGFRI 14 and FACT-EGFRI 18 scores across assessment times were observed. Although agreement (i.e. criterion validity) between individual and summary scales of the FACT-EGFRI 18 for assessing skin toxicity was good, agreement with the clinician-reported CTCAE was only fair. The minimal important difference was determined to be 3 points. The results also demonstrated responsiveness to symptom change. Discussion Based on the results of this multi-center validation study, the FACT-EGFRI 18 patient-reported outcome instrument provided data from the patient’s perspective yielding unique information as well as complementing clinician-rated CTCAE grades, especially for the symptoms of pain, pruritus, and paronychia. Conclusions Good to excellent psychometric properties for the FACT-EGFRI 18 were demonstrated, supporting further use of this patient-reported outcomes measure. Additional validation with a more diverse group of patients should be conducted.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25098020
Volume :
4
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1135cca28a668cf4e3397584feace78b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00220-x