Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison between single-beat and multiple-beat methods for estimation of right ventricular contractility
- Source :
- Critical Care Medicine. 32:1886-1890
- Publication Year :
- 2004
- Publisher :
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2004.
-
Abstract
- Objective: It was investigated whether pharmacologically induced changes in right ventricular contractility can be detected by a so-called “single-beat” method that does not require preload reduction. Design: Prospective animal research. Setting: Laboratory at a large university medical center. Subjects: Eight anesthetized pigs. Interventions: End-systolic elastance values obtained by a recently proposed single-beat method (Eessb) were compared with those obtained using the reference multiple-beat method (Eesmb). Measurements and Main Results: Administration of dobutamine increased Eesmb from 1.6 0.3 to 3.8 0.5 mm Hg/mL (p .001), whereas there was only a trend toward an increase in Eessb from 1.5 0.2 to 1.7 0.4 mm Hg/mL. Esmolol decreased Eesmb from 1.7 0.3 to 1.1 0.2 mm Hg/mL (p .006), whereas there was only a trend for a decrease in Eessb from 1.5 0.2 to 1.3 0.1. Conclusions: The present method using single-beat estimation to assess right ventricular contractility does not work as expected, since it failed to detect either increases or decreases in right ventricular contractility induced by pharmacologic interventions. (Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1886 –1890)
- Subjects :
- Cardiac Catheterization
Cardiotonic Agents
Swine
business.industry
Hemodynamics
Beat (acoustics)
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Esmolol
Myocardial Contraction
Contractility
Preload
Dobutamine
Intensive care
Anesthesia
Heart Function Tests
Heart catheterization
Ventricular Function, Right
medicine
Animals
Prospective Studies
business
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00903493
- Volume :
- 32
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Critical Care Medicine
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....11b39bf5ae61f6486c7b54948b52f679
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000139607.38497.8a