Back to Search
Start Over
Social bufferingandcontact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects onShigellainfection risk among captive rhesus macaques
- Source :
- PeerJ, Vol 4, p e2630 (2016), PeerJ, vol 4, iss 10, Balasubramaniam, K; Beisner, B; Vandeleest, J; Atwill, E; & McCowan, B. (2016). Social buffering and contact transmission: network connections have beneficial and detrimental effects on Shigella infection risk among captive rhesus macaques. PEERJ, 4. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2630. UC Davis: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5fq5j6k5, PeerJ
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- PeerJ, 2016.
-
Abstract
- In social animals, group living may impact the risk of infectious disease acquisition in two ways. On the one hand, social connectedness puts individuals at greater risk or susceptibility for acquiring enteric pathogens via contact-mediated transmission. Yet conversely, in strongly bonded societies like humans and some nonhuman primates, having close connections and strong social ties of support can also socially buffer individuals against susceptibility or transmissibility of infectious agents. Using social network analyses, we assessed the potentially competing roles of contact-mediated transmission and social buffering on the risk of infection from an enteric bacterial pathogen (Shigella flexneri) among captive groups of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Our results indicate that, within two macaque groups, individuals possessing more direct and especially indirect connections in their grooming and huddling social networks wereless susceptibleto infection. These results are in sharp contrast to several previous studies that indicate that increased (direct) contact-mediated transmission facilitates infectious disease transmission, including our own findings in a third macaque group in which individuals central in their huddling network and/or which initiated more fights weremore likelyto be infected. In summary, our findings reveal that an individual’s social connections may increaseordecrease its chances of acquiring infectious agents. They extend the applicability of the social buffering hypothesis, beyond just stress and immune-function-related health benefits, to the additional health outcome of infectious disease resistance. Finally, we speculate that the circumstances under which social buffering versus contact-mediated transmission may occur could depend on multiple factors, such as living condition, pathogen-specific transmission routes, and/or an overall social context such as a group’s social stability.
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
lcsh:Medicine
Biology
2.2 Factors relating to physical environment
Medical and Health Sciences
010603 evolutionary biology
01 natural sciences
Macaque
Social networks
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Vaccine Related
Nonhuman primate
Biodefense
biology.animal
2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
050102 behavioral science & comparative psychology
Aetiology
Animal Behavior
Social network
business.industry
Transmission (medicine)
Prevention
General Neuroscience
Risk of infection
lcsh:R
05 social sciences
Social environment
General Medicine
Biological Sciences
Infectious disease risk
Interpersonal ties
Good Health and Well Being
Infectious Diseases
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Social buffering
Infectious disease (medical specialty)
Immunology
Social animal
Infection
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
business
Contact-mediated transmission
Demography
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 21678359
- Volume :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PeerJ
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....12e81ba091523669260b157ff143d7db
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2630