Back to Search Start Over

Strengthening Patient-provider Relationships

Authors :
Marjory Williams
Connie Rasmussen Wilkinson
Source :
Lippincott's Case Management. 7:86-99
Publication Year :
2002
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2002.

Abstract

In support of the Veterans Health Administration commitment to the promotion of shared decision-making between providers and patients, this study investigated the relationship between the provision of a patient appointment guidebook, designed to promote and support patient participation in the health care visit, and patient perceptions of primary care visit effectiveness. This study compared perceptions among 277 randomly selected patients randomly assigned to one of two groups. Patients assigned to an intervention group received a patient appointment guidebook along with the standard appointment reminder letter prior to the scheduled routine visit. Patients assigned to a control group received only the standard appointment reminder letter. Patient perceptions were assessed with a follow-up questionnaire designed to measure patient agreement with six statements pertaining to primary care visit effectiveness. No significant differences were noted in the proportion of patients in the two groups that agreed with any of the six statements pertaining to primary care visit effectiveness. Significant differences were noted, however, in the proportion of patients in the groups who received preventive health care interventions of influenza vaccination, pneumococcal vaccination, and gender-specific cancer screening. Approximately 37% of the patients in the intervention group provided positive comments about the patient appointment guidebook, while only 7% provided negative comments. Although statistically inconclusive, the narrative comments indicate that a patient appointment guidebook may assist veterans in preparing for primary care appointments. The lack of significant difference between the two groups on the measures of primary care visit effectiveness may be due, in part, to positive perceptions among the sample in general, as reflected by high levels of agreement and predominantly positive comments for both control and intervention groups.

Details

ISSN :
15297764
Volume :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Lippincott's Case Management
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....12fffd094c426845ff5ea90d158f82cf