Back to Search Start Over

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (TAURCAT Study) of Citrate Lock Solution for Prevention of Endoluminal Central Venous Catheter Infection in Neutropenic Hematological Patients

Authors :
Júlia Laporte-Amargós
Montserrat Arnan
Cecilia Martín-Gandul
Isabel Sánchez-Ortega
Manuela Aguilar-Guisado
Dàmaris Berbel
Carlota Gudiol
Cristian Tebé
Anna Sureda
José Miguel Cisneros
Judith Riera
Jordi Carratalà
Isabel Montero
Cristina Royo-Cebrecos
Maria Perayre
Adaia Albasanz-Puig
Sermed Nicolae
Generalitat de Catalunya
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (España)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa
Bionet Medical
Source :
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
American Society for Microbiology, 2020.

Abstract

Infection of long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) remains a challenge in the clinical management of cancer patients. We aimed to determine whether a lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin would be more effective than placebo for preventing nontunneled CVC infection in high-risk neutropenic hematologic patients. We performed a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, parallel, superiority, placebo-controlled trial involving 150 hematological patients with neutropenia carrying nontunneled CVCs who were assigned to receive CVC lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin or heparin alone. The primary endpoint was bacterial colonization of the CVC hubs. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), CVC removal, adverse events related to the lock solution, and the 30-day case fatality rate. CVC lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin was associated with less colonization of the CVC hubs than that with placebo, with no statistically significant differences: 4.1%, versus 10.1% (relative risk [RR] = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11 to 1.52), with a cumulative incidence of 4.17 (95% CI = 0.87 to 11.70) and 10.14 (95% CI = 4.18 to 19.79), respectively. There were no significant differences regarding the secondary endpoints. Only three episodes of CRBSI occurred during the study period. No adverse events related to the administration of the lock solution occurred. In this trial involving high-risk patients carrying nontunneled CVCs, the use of taurolidine-citrate-heparin did not show a benefit over the use of placebo. Nevertheless, the safety of this prevention strategy and the trend toward less hub colonization in the taurolidine-citrate-heparin group raise the interest in assessing its efficacy in centers with higher rates of CRBSI. (This study has been registered in ISRCTN under identifier ISRCTN47102251.)<br />We thank the Bellvitge University Hospital Research Committee for the research grant awarded in 2012 and the nursing staff of the hematology departments. We thank CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support. The TAURCAT study was a noncommercial, investigator-driven clinical trial funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) (grant PI13/01474), and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI; grant RD12/0015/0010), ISCIII, and by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, cofinanced by European Development Regional Fund (A way to achieve Europe, Operational Program Intelligent Growth 2014-2020). The study also received an unrestricted grant from Bionet Medical S.L.

Details

ISSN :
10986596 and 00664804
Volume :
64
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1316e0b0cb5d9d21917279708e469f5b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01521-19