Back to Search Start Over

Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy

Authors :
María Chaparro
Xavier Castells
Maria Sala
Andrea Buron
JONE MIREN ALTZIBAR
Isabel Portillo
Manuel Hernandez-Guerra
Luis Bujanda
Agustín Seoane Urgorri
Maria Lopez-Ceron
Francesc Macià
Vicent Hernandez
Xavier Bessa Caserras
Guillermo Cacho Acosta
Maria Pellise
Jaume Grau
Oscar Murcia
JOAQUIN CUBIELLA
Conrado M Fernandez Rodriguez
Leticia Moreira
Inmaculada Salces
Antoni Castells
Alicia C. Marin
Jose Diaz-Tasende
Pedro Zapater
Jose m Enriquez-navascues
José Marín-Gabriel
Renata Linertová
Pablo Vega
Enrique Quintero
Source :
Endoscopy, r-ISABIAL. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica y Sanitaria de Alicante, instname, r-FISABIO: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG, 2016.

Abstract

Background and study aim: Several factors have been shown to be related to colonoscopy quality; however, little is known about the effects of endoscopist factors. This study analyzed the influence of endoscopist-related characteristics on quality indicators for colonoscopy. Patients and methods: The study included 48 endoscopists who each performed at least 20 colonoscopies in the colonoscopy arm of a randomized controlled trial comparing fecal immuno-chemical test vs. colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. These endoscopists performed a total of 3838 procedures in the trial. The following were calculated for each endoscopist: adenoma detection rate (ADR), advanced ADR, proximal ADR, distal ADR, and adenoma per colonoscopy rate (APCR). The characteristics of endoscopists were assessed with regard to colonoscopy quality using multivariate regression analysis. Endoscopist characteristics included age, sex, exclusive endoscopy practice, years as a physician, years as a specialist, specialty, total (life-long) number of colonoscopies performed, annual colonoscopy volume, number of hours/week dedicated to endoscopy and number of educational activities in the previous year. Results: Factors associated with ADR were age of the endoscopist (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.21; P = 0.01) and lifelong number of colonoscopies (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11; P = 0.01). Only exclusive dedication to endoscopy practice was found to be independently related to proximal ADR (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.15-2.74; P = 0.001). Life-long number of colonoscopies was independently related to detection of distal adenomas (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13; P = 0.01). None of the analyzed endoscopist characteristics was associated with advanced ADR or APCR. Conclusions: This study found that the experience of the endoscopist and exclusive dedication to endoscopy practice, but not annual colonoscopy volume, were associated with better colonoscopy quality.

Details

ISSN :
0013726X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Endoscopy, r-ISABIAL. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica y Sanitaria de Alicante, instname, r-FISABIO: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....13570bca64971859b52e89212ab6f915