Back to Search Start Over

Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) ― Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices Core Data Elements ―

Authors :
W. Schuyler Jones
Mitchell W. Krucoff
Pablo Morales
Rebecca W. Wilgus
Anne H. Heath
Mary F. Williams
James E. Tcheng
J. Danica Marinac-Dabic
Misti L. Malone
Terrie L. Reed
Rie Fukaya
Robert Lookstein
Nobuhiro Handa
Herbert D. Aronow
Daniel J. Bertges
Michael R. Jaff
Thomas T. Tsai
Joshua A. Smale
Margo J. Zaugg
Robert J. Thatcher
Jack L. Cronenwett
Durham NC
Silver Spring Md
Tokyo Japan
New York NY
Providence RI
Burlington Vt
Newton Mass
Denver Colo
Tempe Ariz
Santa Clara Calif
Minneapolis Minn
Lebanon NH
Source :
Circulation Journal. 82:316-322
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Japanese Circulation Society, 2018.

Abstract

Objective The current state of evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease and more specifically of evaluating medical devices used for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the disease process, the multiple physician specialties that perform PVI, the multitude of devices available to treat peripheral artery disease, and the lack of consensus about the best treatment approaches. Because PVI core data elements are not standardized across clinical care, clinical trials, and registries, aggregation of data across different data sources and physician specialties is currently not feasible. Methods Under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Medical Device Epidemiology Network initiative—and its PASSION (Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of the National Registries) program, in conjunction with other efforts to align clinical data standards—the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID) workgroup was convened. RAPID is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to develop a consensus lexicon and to promote interoperability across clinical care, clinical trials, and national and international registries of PVI. Results The current manuscript presents the initial work from RAPID to standardize clinical data elements and definitions, to establish a framework within electronic health records and health information technology procedural reporting systems, and to implement an informatics-based approach to promote the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and registry efforts in PVI. Conclusions Ultimately, we hope this work will facilitate and improve device evaluation and surveillance for patients, clinicians, health outcomes researchers, industry, policymakers, and regulators.

Details

ISSN :
13474820 and 13469843
Volume :
82
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Circulation Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....142da92ae3eb6e8b43d536e18a87773f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-17-1156