Back to Search Start Over

Proportional loss functions for debris flow events

Authors :
Christoph M. Rheinberger
Hans Romang
Michael Bründl
Economie des Ressources Naturelles (LERNA)
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole (UT1)
Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)
Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL
This paper was partly funded through EU FP6 STREP contract no. 081412 ('IRASMOS').
Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)
Source :
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 8 (13), 2147-2156. (2013), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Copernicus Publ. / European Geosciences Union, 2013, 13 (8), pp.2147-2156. ⟨10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013⟩, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 8, Pp 2147-2156 (2013), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 13 (8), pp.2147-2156. ⟨10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013⟩
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Quantitative risk assessments of debris flows and other hydrogeological hazards require the analyst to predict damage potentials. A common way to do so is by use of proportional loss functions. In this paper, we analyze a uniquely rich dataset of 132 buildings that were damaged in one of five large debris flow events in Switzerland. Using the double generalized linear model, we estimate proportional loss functions that may be used for various prediction purposes including hazard mapping, landscape planning, and insurance pricing. Unlike earlier analyses, we control for confounding effects of building characteristics, site specifics, and process intensities as well as for overdispersion in the data. Our results suggest that process intensity parameters are the most meaningful predictors of proportional loss sizes. Cross-validation tests suggest that the mean absolute prediction errors of our models are in the range of 11%, underpinning the accurateness of the approach.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15618633 and 16849981
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 8 (13), 2147-2156. (2013), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Copernicus Publ. / European Geosciences Union, 2013, 13 (8), pp.2147-2156. ⟨10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013⟩, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 8, Pp 2147-2156 (2013), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 13 (8), pp.2147-2156. ⟨10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....149b6a0a247ec4dd1b91e3cd3adfed57