Back to Search
Start Over
The foot-in-the-door technique, crime, and the responsive bystander: A field experiment
- Source :
- Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, 18 (1), pp.60-68
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2016.
-
Abstract
- International audience; A bystander’s reaction to a theft following a foot-in-the door (FITD) technique was observed in a field setting. An experiment was conducted in the pavement area of a bar where a first male confederate was seated alone with his suitcase on the ground. In the FITD condition, the confederate asked a participant for the time, thanked him/her, and left to go into the bar. In the control condition, no initial verbal contact was displayed, and the confederate just left to go into the bar. About 20 seconds after the first confederate had left to go into the bar, a second male confederate arrived, looked carefully around him, took the first confederate’s suitcase, and then left the place. More participants intervened in the FITD condition to stop the theft (84 per cent) than in the control condition (47 per cent). Social responsibility activation was used to explain these results, which has significant implications for encouraging public involvement in crime prevention.
- Subjects :
- Sociology and Political Science
Community safety
05 social sciences
Theft
[SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology
Fear of crime
Foot-in-the-door
050109 social psychology
Social responsibility
Bystander
16. Peace & justice
Public involvement
050105 experimental psychology
[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences
Crime prevention
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Psychology
Law
Safety Research
Social psychology
Foot-in-the-door technique
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 17434629 and 14603780
- Volume :
- 18
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Crime Prevention and Community Safety
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....150b24e41e5bdf4ad0499c29c72fd273