Back to Search Start Over

The foot-in-the-door technique, crime, and the responsive bystander: A field experiment

Authors :
Nicolas Guéguen
Fabien Silone
Angélique Martin
Alexandre Pascual
Université de Bretagne Sud (UBS)
Centre de Recherches en Psychologie Cognition et Communication (CRPCC EA 1285)
Université de Bretagne Sud (UBS)-Université de Brest (UBO)-MEN : EA1285-Université de Rennes 2 (UR2)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)
Université de Bordeaux (UB)
Source :
Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, 18 (1), pp.60-68
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2016.

Abstract

International audience; A bystander’s reaction to a theft following a foot-in-the door (FITD) technique was observed in a field setting. An experiment was conducted in the pavement area of a bar where a first male confederate was seated alone with his suitcase on the ground. In the FITD condition, the confederate asked a participant for the time, thanked him/her, and left to go into the bar. In the control condition, no initial verbal contact was displayed, and the confederate just left to go into the bar. About 20 seconds after the first confederate had left to go into the bar, a second male confederate arrived, looked carefully around him, took the first confederate’s suitcase, and then left the place. More participants intervened in the FITD condition to stop the theft (84 per cent) than in the control condition (47 per cent). Social responsibility activation was used to explain these results, which has significant implications for encouraging public involvement in crime prevention.

Details

ISSN :
17434629 and 14603780
Volume :
18
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Crime Prevention and Community Safety
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....150b24e41e5bdf4ad0499c29c72fd273