Back to Search Start Over

Data from PD-L1 Expression and Immune Escape in Melanoma Resistance to MAPK Inhibitors

Authors :
Helen Rizos
Richard A. Scolyer
Georgina V. Long
James S. Wilmott
John F. Thompson
Robyn P.M. Saw
Julie R. Howle
Richard F. Kefford
Matteo S. Carlino
Alexander M. Menzies
Jean Y. H. Yang
Gulietta M. Pupo
Robert V. Rawson
Hojabr Kakavand
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2023.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the relationship between immune activity, PD-L1 expression, and tumor cell signaling, in metastatic melanomas prior to and during treatment with targeted MAPK inhibitors.Experimental Design: Thirty-eight tumors from 17 patients treated with BRAF inhibitor (n = 12) or combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors (n = 5) with known PD-L1 expression were analyzed. RNA expression arrays were performed on all pretreatment (PRE, n = 17), early during treatment (EDT, n = 8), and progression (PROG, n = 13) biopsies. HLA-A/HLA-DPB1 expression was assessed by IHC.Results: Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of PRE, EDT, and PROG melanomas revealed that transcriptome signatures indicative of immune cell activation were strongly positively correlated with PD-L1 staining. In contrast, MAPK signaling and canonical Wnt/-β-catenin activity was negatively associated with PD-L1 melanoma expression. The expression of PD-L1 and immune activation signatures did not simply reflect the degree or type of immune cell infiltration, and was not sufficient for tumor response to MAPK inhibition.Conclusions: PD-L1 expression correlates with immune cells and immune activity signatures in melanoma, but is not sufficient for tumor response to MAPK inhibition, as many PRE and PROG melanomas displayed both PD-L1 positivity and immune activation signatures. This confirms that immune escape is common in MAPK inhibitor–treated tumors. This has important implications for the selection of second-line immunotherapy because analysis of mechanisms of immune escape will likely be required to identify patients likely to respond to such therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6054–61. ©2017 AACR.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....151a99a2857d24c50054047b0565154e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.c.6525018