Back to Search Start Over

Low-grade serous primary peritoneal carcinoma

Authors :
D. M. Gershenson
Kathleen M. Schmeler
Anais Malpica
Michael T. Deavers
Diane C. Bodurka
Charlotte C. Sun
Source :
Gynecologic Oncology. 121:482-486
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2011.

Abstract

Objective 10% of women with serous ovarian cancer have low-grade carcinomas. These patients are diagnosed at a younger age, have a longer overall survival and a lower response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy compared to women with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. It remains unclear if these features are similar in women with low-grade primary peritoneal cancer (PPC). To further explore this issue, a retrospective analysis of the clinical and pathologic characteristics of women with low-grade serous PPC was performed. Methods A retrospective study of 53 patients with low-grade serous PPC evaluated at a single institution from 1986 to 2009 was performed. All cases were reviewed by a gynecologic pathologist to confirm low-grade serous PPC. Results Median age at diagnosis was 51.7years (range 27.1–82.4). 46 patients (86.8%) underwent primary surgery, with optimal tumor reduction achieved in 30 patients (65.2%). 48 patients (90.6%) received chemotherapy as part of their initial treatment. At the completion of primary treatment, 66.7% of patients were noted to have persistent or progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 66.1months, the 5-year PFS was 16%, yet the 5-year OS was 69%. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first report of women with low-grade serous PPC. Similar to low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, patients with low-grade serous PPC have high rates of persistent disease at the completion of primary treatment yet a long overall survival. Further study focusing specifically on low-grade serous ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinomas is needed to determine the optimal treatment of these diseases.

Details

ISSN :
00908258
Volume :
121
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gynecologic Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....15ac37ef8f67bdf9f2e64f4768c8db20
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.017