Back to Search Start Over

Provider Attitudes and Practice Patterns for Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Authors :
Nicole E. Rich
Reena Salgia
Janice H. Jou
Ruben Hernaez
Amit G. Singal
Neil Mehta
Christina C. Lindenmeyer
Andres Duarte-Rojo
Whitney E. Jackson
Avegail Flores
George N. Ioannou
Ponni V. Perumalswami
Sofia Kagan
Steven Scaglione
Sheila Eswaran
Hrishikesh Samant
Renumathy Dhanasekaran
Oren K. Fix
Shaun Chandna
Laura Kulik
Anjana Pillai
Jorge A. Marrero
Adnan Said
Sanjaya K. Satapathy
Maarouf Hoteit
Prasun K. Jalal
Elizabeth X. Zheng
Naim Alkhouri
Catherine Frenette
Russell Rosenblatt
Nayan M. Patel
Devika Kapuria
Z. Gordon Jiang
Amol S. Rangnekar
Ju Dong Yang
Neehar D. Parikh
Omobonike Oloruntoba
Binu John
Parvez S. Mantry
Veeral Ajmera
Mina Rakoski
James Hanje
Andrew M. Moon
Mobolaji Odewole
Michael D. Leise
Nyan L. Latt
Robert J. Wong
Source :
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
W.B. Saunders, 2020.

Abstract

Background & Aims Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are effective against hepatitis C virus and sustained virologic response is associated with reduced incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is controversy over the use of DAAs in patients with active or treated HCC and uncertainty about optimal management of these patients. We aimed to characterize attitudes and practice patterns of hepatology practitioners in the United States regarding the use of DAAs in patients with HCC. Methods We conducted a survey of hepatology providers at 47 tertiary care centers in 25 states. Surveys were sent to 476 providers and we received 279 responses (58.6%). Results Provider beliefs about risk of HCC recurrence after DAA therapy varied: 48% responded that DAAs reduce risk, 36% responded that DAAs do not change risk, and 16% responded that DAAs increase risk of HCC recurrence. However, most providers believed DAAs to be beneficial to and reduce mortality of patients with complete response to HCC treatment. Accordingly, nearly all providers (94.9%) reported recommending DAA therapy to patients with early-stage HCC who received curative treatment. However, fewer providers recommended DAA therapy for patients with intermediate (72.9%) or advanced (57.5%) HCC undergoing palliative therapies. Timing of DAA initiation varied among providers based on HCC treatment modality: 49.1% of providers reported they would initiate DAA therapy within 3 months of surgical resection whereas 45.9% and 5.0% would delay DAA initiation for 3–12 months and >1 year post-surgery, respectively. For patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 42.0% of providers would provide DAAs within 3 months of the procedure, 46.7% would delay DAAs until 3–12 months afterward, and 11.3% would delay DAAs more than 1 year after TACE. Conclusions Based on a survey sent to hepatology providers, there is variation in provider attitudes and practice patterns regarding use and timing of DAAs for patients with HCC. Further studies are needed to characterize the risks and benefits of DAA therapy in this patient population.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....15b6475f93447f0368531c75532c44b8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.17615/py27-dc96