Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes

Authors :
Peiman Nazerian
Christian Mueller
Alexandre de Matos Soeiro
Bernd A. Leidel
Sibilla Anna Teresa Salvadeo
Francesca Giachino
Simone Vanni
Karin Grimm
Múcio Tavares Oliveira
Emanuele Pivetta
Enrico Lupia
Stefano Grifoni
Fulvio Morello
Elisa Capretti
Matteo Castelli
Simona Gualtieri
Federica Trausi
Stefania Battista
Paolo Bima
Federica Carbone
Maria Tizzani
Maria G. Veglio
Patrick Badertscher
Jasper Boeddinghaus
Thomas Nestelberger
Raphael Twerenbold
Source :
Circulation. 137:250-258
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2018.

Abstract

Background: Acute aortic syndromes (AASs) are rare and severe cardiovascular emergencies with unspecific symptoms. For AASs, both misdiagnosis and overtesting are key concerns, and standardized diagnostic strategies may help physicians to balance these risks. D-dimer (DD) is highly sensitive for AAS but is inadequate as a stand-alone test. Integration of pretest probability assessment with DD testing is feasible, but the safety and efficiency of such a diagnostic strategy are currently unknown. Methods: In a multicenter prospective observational study involving 6 hospitals in 4 countries from 2014 to 2016, consecutive outpatients were eligible if they had ≥1 of the following: chest/abdominal/back pain, syncope, perfusion deficit, and if AAS was in the differential diagnosis. The tool for pretest probability assessment was the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS, 0–3) per current guidelines. DD was considered negative (DD−) if Results: A total of 1850 patients were analyzed. Of these, 438 patients (24%) had ADD-RS=0, 1071 patients (58%) had ADD-RS=1, and 341 patients (18%) had ADD-RS >1. Two hundred forty-one patients (13%) had AAS: 125 had type A aortic dissection, 53 had type B aortic dissection, 35 had intramural aortic hematoma, 18 had aortic rupture, and 10 had penetrating aortic ulcer. A positive DD test result had an overall sensitivity of 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.6–98.6) and a specificity of 64% (95% CI, 61.6–66.4) for the diagnosis of AAS; 8 patients with AAS had DD−. In 294 patients with ADD-RS=0/DD−, 1 case of AAS was observed. This yielded a failure rate of 0.3% (95% CI, 0.1–1.9) and an efficiency of 15.9% (95% CI, 14.3–17.6) for the ADD-RS=0/DD− strategy. In 924 patients with ADD-RS ≤1/DD−, 3 cases of AAS were observed. This yielded a failure rate of 0.3% (95% CI, 0.1–1) and an efficiency of 49.9% (95% CI, 47.7–52.2) for the ADD-RS ≤1/DD− strategy. Conclusions: Integration of ADD-RS (either ADD-RS=0 or ADD-RS ≤1) with DD may be considered to standardize diagnostic rule out of AAS. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02086136.

Details

ISSN :
15244539 and 00097322
Volume :
137
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Circulation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1688626ad4745c2c4754aa9ef8d7d5ac
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.029457