Back to Search Start Over

Diverse Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Drug Resistance Profiles at Screening for ACTG A5288: A Study of People Experiencing Virologic Failure on Second-line Antiretroviral Therapy in Resource-limited Settings

Authors :
Marije Van Schalkwyk
Beatriz Grinsztejn
Peter Mugyenyi
Raquel Viana
Michael Hughes
John W. Mellors
Justin Ritz
Carlos Silva de Jesus
Robert A. Salata
Shanmugam Saravanan
Laura Hovind
Evelyn Hogg
Robert E. Gross
Catherine Godfrey
Ann C. Collier
Linda Wieclaw
Carole L. Wallis
Rosie Mngqibisa
Source :
Clin Infect Dis
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance profiles are needed to optimize individual patient management and to develop treatment guidelines. Resistance profiles are not well defined among individuals on failing second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Methods Resistance genotypes were performed during screening for enrollment into a trial of third-line ART (AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 5288). Prior exposure to both nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-NRTIs and confirmed virologic failure on a protease inhibitor–containing regimen were required. Associations of drug resistance with sex, age, treatment history, plasma HIV RNA, nadir CD4+T-cell count, HIV subtype, and country were investigated. Results Plasma HIV genotypes were analyzed for 653 screened candidates; most had resistance (508 of 653; 78%) to 1 or more drugs. Genotypes from 133 (20%) showed resistance to at least 1 drug in a drug class, from 206 (32%) showed resistance to at least 1 drug in 2 drug classes, and from 169 (26%) showed resistance to at least 1 drug in all 3 commonly available drug classes. Susceptibility to at least 1 second-line regimen was preserved in 59%, as were susceptibility to etravirine (78%) and darunavir/ritonavir (97%). Susceptibility to a second-line regimen was significantly higher among women, younger individuals, those with higher nadir CD4+ T-cell counts, and those who had received lopinavir/ritonavir, but was lower among prior nevirapine recipients. Conclusions Highly divergent HIV drug resistance profiles were observed among candidates screened for third-line ART in LMIC, ranging from no resistance to resistance to 3 drug classes. These findings underscore the need for access to resistance testing and newer antiretrovirals for the optimal management of third-line ART in LMIC.

Details

ISSN :
15376591
Volume :
71
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1704c070be1b404ed76545589a6c3931