Back to Search Start Over

Data from A Case-Matched Gender Comparison Transcriptomic Screen Identifies eIF4E and eIF5 as Potential Prognostic Markers in Male Breast Cancer

Authors :
Valerie Speirs
Abeer M. Shaaban
Lucy F. Stead
Davide Melisi
Marie-Louise Fjällskog
Ingrid A. Hedenfalk
Maria G. Daidone
Vera Cappelletti
Helene H. Thygesen
Margaret Jeffery
Ian O. Ellis
Janina Kulka
Rosemary A. Walker
Mark Stephens
Sami Shousha
Elena Provenzano
Marcella Mottolese
Anna Di Benedetto
Maria Litwiniuk
Rani Kanthan
J. Louise Jones
Lee B. Jordan
Laura Fulford
Jo Dent
Gabor Cserni
Hedieh Honarpisheh
Cecilia Nilsson
Carmine Carbone
Charlotte A.B. Suleman
Alastair Droop
Sreekumar Sundara Rajan
Matthew P. Humphries
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2023.

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer affects both genders, but is understudied in men. Although still rare, male breast cancer (MBC) is being diagnosed more frequently. Treatments are wholly informed by clinical studies conducted in women, based on assumptions that underlying biology is similar.Experimental Design: A transcriptomic investigation of male and female breast cancer was performed, confirming transcriptomic data in silico. Biomarkers were immunohistochemically assessed in 697 MBCs (n = 477, training; n = 220, validation set) and quantified in pre- and posttreatment samples from an MBC patient receiving everolimus and PI3K/mTOR inhibitor.Results: Gender-specific gene expression patterns were identified. eIF transcripts were upregulated in MBC. eIF4E and eIF5 were negatively prognostic for overall survival alone (log-rank P = 0.013; HR = 1.77, 1.12–2.8 and P = 0.035; HR = 1.68, 1.03–2.74, respectively), or when coexpressed (P = 0.01; HR = 2.66, 1.26–5.63), confirmed in the validation set. This remained upon multivariate Cox regression analysis [eIF4E P = 0.016; HR = 2.38 (1.18–4.8), eIF5 P = 0.022; HR = 2.55 (1.14–5.7); coexpression P = 0.001; HR = 7.04 (2.22–22.26)]. Marked reduction in eIF4E and eIF5 expression was seen post BEZ235/everolimus, with extended survival.Conclusions: Translational initiation pathway inhibition could be of clinical utility in MBC patients overexpressing eIF4E and eIF5. With mTOR inhibitors that target this pathway now in the clinic, these biomarkers may represent new targets for therapeutic intervention, although further independent validation is required. Clin Cancer Res; 23(10); 2575–83. ©2016 AACR.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....174b3ffbad5c34c993f0cf995b181a98
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.c.6526449.v1