Back to Search Start Over

The reform patient information sheet sub study - an embedded trial evaluating the enhancement of patient information sheets to improve recruitment

Authors :
Caroline McIntosh
Joy Adamson
David J. Torgerson
Anne-Maree Keenan
Sarah Cockayne
Anthony C. Redmond
Jo Rick
Kate Hicks
Hylton B. Menz
Lorraine Loughrey
Lisa Farndon
Peter Knapp
Caroline Fairhurst
Sarah E Lamb
Sara Rodgers
Belen Corbacho
Jude Watson
Wesley Vernon
Peter Bower
Source :
Trials
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2015.

Abstract

During recruitment, potential trial participants are usually given a written study patient information sheet (PIS). These are often long, complex and visually unappealing documents, which may have a negative impact on recruitment. Improving their readability by employing user testing, and their presentation by using graphic designers may improve patient understanding and aid recruitment. We undertook an embedded randomised controlled trial within the NIHR-funded REFORM study, as part of the MRC START initiative, to evaluate whether enhancing PIS improves trial recruitment and retention. 6,900 patients due to be mailed a REFORM recruitment pack were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive one of three types of PIS: the original based on the NHS ethics template (n=2,298); an enhanced, user tested PIS (n=2,301); or a ‘template’ PIS which was developed using an enhanced PIS from another trial in a similar population (n=2,301). 193 participants (2.8%) were randomised to the trial: 62 (2.7%) in the control group; 63 (2.7%) in the user tested group; and 68 (3.0%) in the template group (OR: template vs control 1.10 (95% CI 0.77-1.56, p=60); user tested vs control 1.01 (95% CI 0.71-1.45, p=0.94); and user tested vs template 0.92 (95% CI 0.65-1.31, p=0.65)). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that PIS allocation did not significantly predict recruitment (p= 0.33) or retention in the trial (p=0.83). There was no evidence to suggest that enhanced PIS increased recruitment and retention rates to the REFORM trial. However, the number of patients randomised was low and we may be underpowered to detect a difference.

Details

ISSN :
17456215
Volume :
16
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Trials
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....176f4ad10ade3f9dff4bfc479b2a82bb