Back to Search Start Over

PATH-48. THE DNA METHYLATION LANDSCAPE OF CORE AND PERIPHERAL DIFFUSE GLIOMA REGIONS SHOWS LITTLE SPATIAL SUBTYPE HETEROGENEITY AFTER CONSIDERING TUMOR PURITY

Authors :
Pieter Wesseling
Jaap C. Reijneveld
Thomas Koopman
Frederik Barkhof
Petra J. W. Pouwels
Kevin W. Anderson
William P. Vandertop
Niels Verburg
Philip C. De Witt Hamer
Kevin C. Johnson
Floris P. Barthel
Ronald Boellaard
Maqsood Yaqub
Annemieke J.M. Rozemuller
Otto S. Hoekstra
Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Michael D. Taylor
Jan Heijmans
Joseph F. Costello
Roel G.W. Verhaak
Source :
Neuro Oncol
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Oxford University Press, 2019.

Abstract

While diffuse gliomas are notorious for their histopathological, genetic and transcriptional spatial heterogeneity, little is known about their epigenetic spatial heterogeneity. The result of spatial (epi)genetic analysis is strongly influenced by the proportion of cancer cells in a sample, so called tumor purity. However, a gold standard for assessment of tumor purity is lacking. We set out to analyze tumor purity using different measurement modalities and explore tumor purity-corrected DNA methylation spatial heterogeneity in glioma. DNA methylation(-derived), quantitative histological and radiological measurements of tumor purity, as well as DNA methylation profiles, were analyzed in 133 image-guided multi-sector stereotactic biopsy samples of 16 patients with newly diagnosed glioma. These biopsies were acquired in regions with and without abnormalities on MRI. Data was validated in two independent populations of respectively 102 multi-region samples in 24 glioma patients and 64 single-region samples from patients without glioma. DNA methylation profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the patients without glioma was used to predict DNA methylation and transcriptional subtype. Consensus measurement of tumor purity estimates (CPE) ranged from 0 to 91% and was most correlated with the DNA methylation measurement of tumor purity. Neuropathological qualitative assessment of tumor presence generally corresponded well with CPE, but occasionally samples reported as ‘histologically normal’ demonstrated tumor purities up to 53%. After filtering specimens with tumor purity less than 50%, DNA methylation subtype showed little spatial heterogeneity, this in contrast to transcriptional subtype. Samples from core and peripheral regions showed similar DNA methylation profiles. Non-purity related intratumoral heterogeneity for promotor methylation of epigenetically regulated genes was minimal, but higher in IDH-wildtype than in IDH-mutant gliomas. In conclusion, after considering DNA methylation-based measurement of tumor purity DNA methylation in diffuse gliomas shows little spatial heterogeneity; incorporating such tumor purity information can further increase the reliability of methylation-profiling-based tumor classification.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Neuro Oncol
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....17b76e51b8e58439be6f8c7cb8d3c798