Back to Search
Start Over
Development and Validation of Automated <scp>Magnetic Resonance</scp> Parkinsonism Index 2.0 to Distinguish <scp>Progressive Supranuclear Palsy‐Parkinsonism</scp> From <scp>Parkinson's Disease</scp>
- Source :
- Movement disorders (Online) 37 (2022): 1272–1281. doi:10.1002/mds.28992, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Quattrone A.; Bianco M.G.; Antonini A.; Vaillancourt D.E.; Seppi K.; Ceravolo R.; Strafella A.P.; Tedeschi G; Tessitore A.; Cilia R.; Morelli M.; Nigro S.; Vescio B.; Arcuri P.P.; De Micco R.; Cirillo M.; Weis L.; Fiorenzato E.; Biundo R.; Burciu R.G.; Krismer F.; McFarland N.R.; Mueller C.; Gizewski E.R.; Cosottini M.; Del Prete E.; Mazzucchi S.; Quattrone A./titolo:Development and Validation of Automated Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index 2.0 to Distinguish Progressive Supranuclear Palsy-Parkinsonism From Parkinson's Disease/doi:10.1002%2Fmds.28992/rivista:Movement disorders (Online)/anno:2022/pagina_da:1272/pagina_a:1281/intervallo_pagine:1272–1281/volume:37
- Publication Year :
- 2022
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 2022.
-
Abstract
- Background: Differentiating progressive supranuclear palsy-parkinsonism (PSP-P) from Parkinson's disease (PD) is clinically challenging. Objective: This study aimed to develop an automated Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index 2.0 (MRPI 2.0) algorithm to distinguish PSP-P from PD and to validate its diagnostic performance in two large independent cohorts. Methods: We enrolled 676 participants: a training cohort (n=346; 43 PSP-P, 194 PD, and 109 control subjects) from our center and an independent testing cohort (n=330; 62 PSP-P, 171 PD, and 97 control subjects) from an international research group. We developed a new in-house algorithm for MRPI 2.0 calculation and assessed its performance in distinguishing PSP-P from PD and control subjects in both cohorts using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: The automated MRPI 2.0 showed excellent performance in differentiating patients with PSP-P from patients with PD and control subjects both in the training cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]=0.93 [95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.98] and AUC=0.97 [0.93–1.00], respectively) and in the international testing cohort (PSP-P versus PD, AUC=0.92 [0.87–0.97]; PSP-P versus controls, AUC=0.94 [0.90–0.98]), suggesting the generalizability of the results. The automated MRPI 2.0 also accurately distinguished between PSP-P and PD in the early stage of the diseases (AUC=0.91 [0.84–0.97]). A strong correlation (r=0.91, P < 0.001) was found between automated and manual MRPI 2.0 values. Conclusions: Our study provides an automated, validated, and generalizable magnetic resonance biomarker to distinguish PSP-P from PD. The use of the automated MRPI 2.0 algorithm rather than manual measurements could be important to standardize measures in patients with PSP-P across centers, with a positive impact on multicenter studies and clinical trials involving patients from different geographic regions. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
- Subjects :
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Parkinson's disease
Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index 2.0
Parkinson Disease
automated MRI biomarker
progressive supranuclear palsy-parkinsonism
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
eye diseases
Diagnosis, Differential
Parkinsonian Disorders
Neurology
Humans
Paralysis
Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive
Neurology (clinical)
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15318257 and 08853185
- Volume :
- 37
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Movement Disorders
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....17e16b259991f5d2c0d244bb037d42ac
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28992